Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Cap-Z-ro]

Theoria,

What you are saying is just a word salad.  Plus I am willing to bet you had no clue how the magnetic field viewing film worked until tonight.  You might have bluster but there is nothing behind it.  It's not that hard to see through you.

If I worked in a fish market then it would take me five seconds to know if you knew how to gut a fish or not.  It's just the way it is.

I don't see a "dumb-ass stumbling event" in your future like Captain Zero is hoping for.

MileHigh



Who can take these words seriously ?

When someone falsely accuses you of exposing his private email on  here, his credibility equates to ZERO

Pardon the pun if you wood.

Regards...



P.S.:  Since you have all of that righteous indignation, then YOU explain what a field REALLY IS to us.

[TheoriaApophasis]

P.S.:  Since you have all of that righteous indignation, then YOU explain what a field REALLY IS to us.

The word FIELD is the evil "skeleton in the basement" for ALL branches of physics,   but by physics I mean a structure built around GR and QM (general relativity and quantum bullshat).


Approach any physics professor and ask him one thing "Define FIELD , please"

He will twitch like snail in a SALT BATH


Everything is mediated by , thru, in, and between FIELDS,  ........Every god*amn thing.


But thats the one word that scares the sh*t out of them.    Even in their insanity, they KNOW that Fields dont have SHIT to do with ANY type of particle 




Circular fallacy??-------- Call a FIELD a region, and a REGION = FIELD     ROFL!!!!

Force???  OF WHAT???   there are NO PARTICLES that define ANY FING FIELD...............next.



The world "FIELD" is like having a child with 3 eyeballs and one leg you NEVER WANT ANYONE TO SEE...........thats what the word FIELD is to "science" (so-called)



Ask a  "scientist"   (like a child would)     "OK,......so thats the magnet,......what that stuff going out AROUND the magnet, since it cannot be particles, and it certainly isnt SPACE, since Tesla and others said Space is Xaos/nothing/a privation"   


Space doesnt DO anything, it only gives definitional boundaries WITHIN a field, not from WITHOUT it.   

Nobody has ever seen space "do something"   ROFL   


watch em' twitch

[MileHigh]

Ahh, I see, so you can't answer the question either.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ahh, I see, so you can't answer the question either.

Me? ....Its in the book, about 2 pages.... which is almost an insult, since I'm working on a huge book on the FULL denotation of FIELDS


and go figure, the Greeks got it right so so so very long ago.   The Khora/Chora ('field').
As I may have mentioned before, Im a translator of ancient Greek, (and Russian, and prakrit .....few others).

...... let me show you an excerpt from Aristotle on same from one of my books....
( I cannot even relate to you HOW MUCH the Greeks really understood so very very very long ago. The original Greek is mind blowing , especially that of Plotinus).


The translation below of "DOWN" is incorrect, in the Greek it means WITHIN, or COUNTERSPACE (the "nest of the Ether"- Plotinus)

μέσα ...meaning "within, inside, counterspace, point" (not literal point, but SUPER-POINT, as in energy fulcrum)

"UP" just means Spatial

"SIMPLE" means linear / radial (dielectricity)

"CIRCULAR" is the same, of course....as in magnetism.





"Einstein and his ilk reified space as 'something' that 'did things' and 'acted upon things'. This is the fallacy of attribute reification, and is a titanic error of thought and theory. Einstein has blamed the flies (forces) on the horse feces (space), completely ignoring the horse (fields) entirely. This brain wasting idiocy can and must come to an end given time and intelligent minds to see clearly. Nobody who has ever lived has seen space 'do' anything."  -Author

[gravityblock]

TinMan,

Are you sure your cylinder magnet is axially magnetized and not radially?  If I remember correctly you previously stated you couldn't find your compass.  The PM rotating in an opposite direction when the sides are taped is an indicator you are using a radially magnetized cylinder magnet instead of an axially magnetized magnet rotating on it's magnetic axis.  Also, please compare the below quote made by you earlier in the thread with a comment you made in one of your latest videos (snapshot below).  As you can see, in one statement you say the rotation direction doesn't change when flipping the magnet over, and in another statement you say the rotation direction does change when flipping the magnet around.  The apparent contradiction in your statements may also be an indicator of you performing the tests with various magnets having different field configurations.  Also, in one of your videos you referred to a radial magnet as being diametrically magnetized, or vice versa if my memory serves me correctly.  An axially magnetized magnet rotating on it's magnetic axis will rotate in opposite directions when the magnet is flipped over.  However, a radial magnetized magnet will rotate in the same direction when flipped around, and will rotate in opposite directions with the sides taped as compared to no tape.  Can you please verify how your cylinder magnet is magnetized so there is no misunderstanding on my part.

Of course i know that if we flip the magnet over,it will spin in the opposite direction,as it will if we swap the voltage polarity over.And if we do both at the same time,the spin direction wont change-all this i know Gravoc.

Gravock