Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Anyway, that was a real thrashing session there   You actually have to be competent in something to propose something new.  You are just flailing and every single question that I asked of you in order to see if you could demonstrate any competency was a big fail on your part.  That's the way it is.

The only person flailing is you , son.     hows that definition of FIELD going?


Yes, hows that thrashing you got feel?    Not too tough I assume.


If I wanted followers I would be nice and said BS fools like you AGREED with.     I want / seek  NO followers


Nice sophistry there son.  Doesnt work here.



New, whats new?    Most of this is the premise of Maxwell and Heaviside,    suggest you read real science, boy.

What you call "NEW" was there all along, you upset YOU did'nt figure it out yourself boy?



You have nothing to offer but sophistry, logomachy, and lip flapping

[MileHigh]

There is no "slice" of a magnet son

Each slice in a bar magnet is essentially identical to the adjacent slice.  The center slice and the two slices on either side in a standard bar magnet are essentially identical.  There is nothing special about the center of a bar magnet, nothing at all.  There is no Bloch wall and there is no dielectric inertial plane.  If there was a Bloch wall or a "dielectric inertial plane" there would have to be something unique and different about the center slice - but in fact the center slice is identical to the slices on either side.

I can also see that the concept of considering thin imaginary slices inside a bar magnet appears to be foreign to you.  I guess that you are not familiar with this way of thinking.  It's beyond your experience.

The term "dielectric inertial plane" doesn't even exist.  It's just your own construct, one of the ingredients in your word salad.  I suspect that you read something pre-1930 and did not understand what they were really meaning and you adopted the term as your own.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

What a mess. Further and further down the rabbit hole of the Tattoed Genius's delusional system. But there is still no answer to the REAL CHALLENGE that the Tattooed Genius keeps dodging: design an oscillator and predict its output frequency without resorting to any of the things that Apoptosis denies.

I can do it using standard EE math and concepts. So can MH, and so can any person who paid attention in school and didn't think he was better than his teachers. But clearly... Apoptosis cannot, without using those same concepts which he denies.

Go write a book proving me wrong.      It'll never happen.      You, like your MilesHigh counterpart are nothing but keyboard jockey and internet filth.

I was up until 8Am experimenting last night, had 2 scientists visit me today, one drove 200+ miles to see 2 new inventions.   



Im "doing" the DO,  you......you've got NOTHING.     

[TheoriaApophasis]

The term "dielectric inertial plane" doesn't even exist.  It's just your own construct, one of the ingredients in your word salad.  I suspect that you read something pre-1930 and did not understand what they were really meaning and you adopted the term as your own.

MileHigh

I love the way you make claims with NO EVIDENCES or experiments at all.   Proof you're  a keyboard jockey and internet filth.



>>>>>>>>>>>>Each slice in a bar magnet is essentially identical to the adjacent slice


I said that further up in the thread, moron................  cant you READ??

GO research this premise boy, -------------   "point NONSPECIFIC self-similarity"

There is no "slice" of a magnet son,  the entire physical magnet is COHERENT, and its field pressures are mediated into the SAME geometry at BOTH macro AND micro/atomic

what is FORCED TO THE CENTER................is not the same as what is "LITERALLY AT THE CENTER"


Why the hell do you think the dielectric inertial plane MOVES immediate even BEFORE two magnets are brought together? ?   Idiot


Dont you even KNOW that magnetism and dielectricity move OPPOSITE each other?     ??

Now, how do you conjugate 2 FIELDS moving opposite each other in a BINDING SYSTEM??? ( a magnet for example)




You, son, live ENTIRELY in the "WORLD OF C"      below:---------

[picowatt]

weak magnets created from magnetic induction from a strong magnet to a ferrite.     Its still magneto-dielectric alignment.



Field pressure mediation is retained (to a degree, of course) in stroking an iron bar and creating a weak magnet, or compass needle.  Magneto-dielectric 'elasticity' of the ferrous system retains a weak coherency.

which is
A: why its so weak
B: why you can reverse polarity on such ferrites so easily
C: why even hot temps ruin them (hot car temps)

TA,

What I was really asking was whether or not magnets made without "electrification of cap banks..." possess the same properties (centrifugal, centripetal, and dielectric plane) that you theorize exist in other magnets that are created through "electrification from cap banks..."?

A simple yes or no would be appreciated...

PW