Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

It is interesting that the magnetic field seems to be conducted through the bolt

No it isnt, ...it doesnt matter ONE SINGLE BIT THAT THE BOLT IS STAINLESS,     the bolt is reacting to the dielectric of the magnets.      Stainless,  Aluminum, Iron.   DOES NOT MATTER.


>>>>>>Paramagnetic, ...ferrous.., "non-magnetic"....diamagnetic    ALL ARE STILL affected by the "magnet" <<<<<<<

The wrong premise of "Stainless doesnt "attract" to a magnet" is a valid premise from ANYTHING ANYONE is taught,    but that is not how "magnets" work


A "magnet is NOT A MAGNET", (what the hell??)     magnetism is radiation of the charging dielectric field IN the (so-called) "magnet"


As such, that its surgical grade stainless DOES NOT MATTER ONE SINGLE BIT



So-called "magnetic attraction" occurs at the coherent displacement of the dielectric of the ferrous (OR stainless, OR aluminum, however without resultant acceleration of same , or "attraction"...) object ACCELERATING towards the "magnet"    NOT due to magnetism ....   (all this is IN THE BOOK)

That stainless NOR aluminum do not accelerate to a magnet, whereas Iron DOES, has bred this UTTERLY WRONG idea that  "something is NOT AFFECTED by a magnet"

They are ALL affected by the "magnet", period 200% certainty, ......that certain metals etc etc  DO NOT JUMP / ACCELERATE TO a "magnet"  means nothing as per the reaction from the dielectric object (the "magnet").



>>>>>I affect WATER with magnets, I affect PLANT GROWTH with magnets<<<<  (and have videos of this fact)................. Dielectricity and magnetism are the 2 co-principles of the entire COSMOS.

I assure you, that just because it DOES NOT ACCELERATE to a "magnet" means nothing ultimately,    ALL are affected by the dielectric field. !!!!!!!!!  ALLLL





Im splitting LASER LIGHT OFF MAGNETS using 2 devices and a splitter.............  anyone know that a magnet  TEARS LIGHT APART?   Oh yes it ABSOGODDAMNLUTELY DOES

I have the device that does it, posted pictures of same few pages ago, have built the device with an associate,  seeking a patent for same.




Yes, heres the ("crazy" bit nobody can/wants to/ believe... etc)    Your LONG HELD belief that "magnetic attraction" is driven by magnetism is 100% dead wrong  (what the hell???) .

Sok, but alas, thats the case,  I can prove it, I will make more videos (already made one on this) on this fact.


In fact JC Maxwell said this himself   ...........but hey,  "nobody reads that OLD SHIT anymore"   

[d3x0r]

FIELDS have NOTHING to do with particles,  not one stinking bit.


Nor do pixie dust  "discharge particles" .....i.e. electrons,.........dont exist.


Steinmetz denied such nonsense, so did Tesla, so did Heaviside, so did JJ  Thomson himself!!!!!!

Really? CRTs don't work?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Really? CRTs don't work?

you dont get it,  CRT are dielectric tubes.


All your cherished sacred cows about "discharge particle"  i.e.  electrons is pure twaddle. 


THAT something "works" and  HOW something works........2 wholly diff. things  son      


Even the DISCOVERER of the "electron" (actually it was discovered by Maxwell) ,  JJ Thomson DENIED it was a particle.



"There is no rest mass to an 'electron'. It is given here the 'electron' is no more than a broken loose "hold fast" under the grip of
the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this
reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein's Theory of Relativity."

"This gaseous Ether is the seat of electrical phenomena through the process of its polarization. This polarization gives rise to
induction, which then gives rise to stored energy. Tesla gives a good presentation of his Ether ideas in his "Experiments with Alternate
Currents of High Potential and High Frequency." Mentioned previously, the Planck, Q, as the primary dimensional relation defining
the "Polarized Ether", this as an "Atom of Electricity". It is however, from the views of J.J. Thomson, the Coulomb, psi, the total
dielectric induction is the primary dimension defining the "Polarized Ether". The lawyer like skill of today's theoretical physicist
(Pharisee) has erased this understanding from human memory, it is henceforth sealed by the Mystic Idol of Albert Einstein. If Einstein
says no, then it is impossible. What a nice little package."


"Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the
'electron', on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the
magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated" - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric
Discharges, Waves and Impulses)


The idea of electricity as a flow of 'electrons' in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as "a psychosis". This encouraged
Heaviside to begin a series of writings

"Electrons as a separate, distinct entity...doesn't really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a 'field'." - Dr. Steve
Biller



"Here we will dispel the "electronics nerd" concept that a capacitor stores "electrons" in its plates. Taking the pair of copper plates
as in the previous experiment, but now we have two pairs of plates, one pair of plates distant from the other pair of plates. Upon one
pair of plates is imposed an electro-static potential between them. The cube of 10-C oil is inserted between this "charged" set of plates.
This hereby establishes a dielectric field of induction within the unit cube of 10-C oil. Now we then remove this cube of oil,
withdrawing it from the space bounded by the charged pair of copper plates, and taking this unit cube of oil, it is then inserted into the
space bounded by the other uncharged pair of plates. Upon insertion it is found that the un-charged pair of plates have now in fact
become charged also. It here can be seen that a cube of dielectric induction can be carried through space, from one set of plates to
another set of plates."

Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end
of one unit line of dielectric induction.


"The notion exists that the electro-motive force, E.M.F. in volts, is established by "cutting" lines of magnetic induction via a socalled
electric conductor. This "cutting" is then said to impel the motions of so-called electrons within the conducting material. It is
however that a perfect conductor cannot "cut" through lines of induction, or flux lines, Phi. Heaviside points out that the perfect
conductor is a perfect obstructer and magnetic induction cannot gain entry into the so-called conducting material. So where is the
current, how then does an E.M.F. come about? Now enters the complication; it can be inferred that an electrical generator that is
wound with a perfect conducting material cannot produce an E.M.F. No lines of flux can be cut and the Ether gets wound up in a knot.
Heaviside remarks that the practitioners of his day "do a good deal of churning up the Ether in their dynamos".

You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their "force lines" is the
"flow of electrons"; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance. There are no discrete
particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation,
only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called 'electrons' are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle
of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not "electrons", nor assuredly are there energy
discharges in the vacuum of space involving 'electrons'; the 'electron' is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty
mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist.

Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge;
dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q;
'electrons' do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields


The 'electron microscope' lie
There are no negatively "charged" particles in this universe. Negative electricity discharges while positive electricity charges. The
negative depolarizing force functions in the opposite manner and direction to the positive polarizing force. – W. Russell

"Always question the academic who tells you he's manipulating particles that nobody has never witnessed. Countless particles are
created in the Atomistic religion of quantum as demonstrable redesignations of electrical and magnetic effects and fields. An entire
academic pantheon of liars is established to perpetrate this nonsense." – Author

"Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses 'electrons' to form an image, special
preparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the
vacuum. All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by
covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material. This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater". The sputter
coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum. Argon gas and an electric field
cause an 'electron' to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a
negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto
the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating "

Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for "electron" microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent
them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original
sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he's "shooting his electron gun". A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is
not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it. This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine
images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor "lenses" of dielectric flux
lines. Ferrofluid

[TheoriaApophasis]

Below

[93RDELEMENT]

Fields are a form of mass even if there is no mass its all energy conservation ! The universe will develop an amount of force on any object and in more way than words or numbers can determine so I agree but also disagree what that means is that a field has no mass than it has mass its on off on off ..............

X is above the speed of light and Y is at 10% to the speed of light yet X and Y ARE THE SAME LIKE YOUR COIN IT HAS 2 SIDES YOU CANT HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER ......

Any way I don't use drugs I get my high from reality ! Looks like the bugs have all done a runner hahahahah mention particle physics and the electron plumbers hide behind a battery hahahah come on you electron plumbers I can smell you, don't be frightened I will only short circuit your stupid O S and burn out your battery hahahah ............... NOW THE REAL MAGNETIC VORTEX !!!!  In a pyramid they found gold wire wound like a coil and formed into something like a hat so I made one but used Iron to rap the gold around and used a Chinese bowl in the key of C to form the harmonic . It is said that all stone circles are in the key of C and applied a 12v DC CHARGE TO MY SURPRISE A MAGNETIC FIELD WAS OSCILATING AT THE HEAD OF THE DEVICE ..

So there is the magnetic vortex just crush up ferrite magnets and fill up the inside of the device make two and face them to each other and up the volts at a million volts the vortex will spin at light speed, place any object in the field and if you know there natural resonance tune the oscillations to that frequency ........ The mass in the field than has no gravity ! Its the same as blocking an RF signal with 2 signals either side of the signal you want to block  ...  Hutchison does it by chance yet this technology was first used between 5000 and 10 000 years ago... 

me