Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Farmhand]

While I do not necessarily think a self running motor or generator can be made using the effect, the effect does actually exist.

If you put a piece of magnetic material like iron on the pole of a cylinder magnet (which is what I tried) and that piece is the correct
length then when approached with another magnet oriented so the like poles are directed at each other then the magnets will first
repel then at a closer distance the magnets both attract to the iron.

[93RDELEMENT]

There is an idiot here I thought he was mad but now I know he's just an idiot soaking up the response, changing the laws of reality mixing it with drug induced brain cells than see all energy as nothing but a delusion in he's own head ! This was about magnetic vortexes now its about a mental case full of stupidity ignorance and denial ....  WHAT A SHAME .......

Nice proof of mass I wonder what the idiot will say about that one ? But he cant can he he's is not made of anything no field no electrons no atoms no logic no sense of reality in fact  he is not even alive hahahahahahahahah come on dude stop the wind up look in the mirror leave the magnetic alone its got electrons there on off on off hahahah .... lol you monkey hahahaha

me 

[TheoriaApophasis]

If he or others actually KNEW what the term "polarized" actually MEANS and IMPLIES, .........   


people always confuse  "magnetic polarization" and   "polarized fields" and ALWAYS what the hell "polarization" MEANS   

[d3x0r]

While I do not necessarily think a self running motor or generator can be made using the effect, the effect does actually exist.

If you put a piece of magnetic material like iron on the pole of a cylinder magnet (which is what I tried) and that piece is the correct
length then when approached with another magnet oriented so the like poles are directed at each other then the magnets will first
repel then at a closer distance the magnets both attract to the iron.

sounds like a version of CMR magnets... correlated magnetics research uhmm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65XwNwgyWO4
http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com/

[d3x0r]

I see you have no clue about field repulsion / induction.      Nice work there.

Sure I do; in order for the field to do work against a mass it must be associated with another mass; if it's not, it can do no work against the mass to be moved.

Names are MEANINGLESS descriptions/subjective connotation.   In denotation, electrons have NO mass, and are NOT particles.   PERIOD.

Even Tesla used the term ELECTRON, son,  he also however DENIED they were PARTICLES,     Got it?


Thats a BS circular argument, (AND ONLY A CLAIM)... that IDIOTS have been CALLING it a particle for a long time doesnt mean jack shit.   Wrong.


"Theyre called particles therefore they are particles"       WHERE did you learn logic at? ??       

Yes, and science has evolved, and the name continues to remain the same without contention except in your new faith-based model.

Nope, CRTs were FIRST created as a testing device.....  the CONCEPT OF the electron came AFTER and was DENIED by its very discoverer,.....JJ Thomson DENIED the electron was a particle.   Clueless

I see you know NOTHING.

Yes, I know of that BS, however there is no such nonsense as a "rest mass" to an electron, several scientists have denied this has EVER been measured

I measured it in high school.... not accurately... which is really what the other articles say... 'not measured accurately'

measured WITH WHAT?   There can be NO rest to what is dielectric or electric discharge,    DISCHARGE itself is DEFINITIONAL MOVEMENT, moron........"rest mass" my goddamn ass.   You, son, are INSANE. 


Forget about the CRT, son.  I have 13 other testing medium that have nothing to do with CRT tubes.    Go study JC Maxwell and maybe learn something.


There are no electrons, negative charges, special-dimensions, warped space (resoundingly denied by Tesla and others), and no
p hotons; only charge, induction and radiation/discharges and their relational spins, all as mediated thru the Ether. Quantum and
Relativity is a quack religion of mathematical physics based upon the absurd premise that the universe is a giant sea of interactive
massless tiny invisible beads and that space itself, nothing, mediates interactions and can be genuinely 'warped'. Such conceptual
Atomistic reifications as amplified by GR (Relativity) cannot be enjoined, and the only genuine warping occurring is not out in the
cosmos of space, but in the empty spaces between the ears of those who reify such absurdities; warped minds rationally would invent
warped space; its purely logical in its insanity that the former produce the later.

Sure; van degraff generators don't work, and don't generate something we've labeled as 'electrostatic charge' with either positive or negative properties to further define it.

Space has only one dimension, space, which is a metrical dimension. The use of cubic notation is habit-based, any number of coordinates
in any number of geometries can serve to define the boundaries of space. Nature is not governed by the irrational
pontifications of GR and QM, rather it is governed by mutually interactive reciprocal conjugates of charges-discharges, centripetalcentrifugal
movements, both spatial and counterspatial. Instantaneous action at a distance, and fields are all Ether modality mediations
as propagated by counterspace-in-disturbance, the Ether, its pressure gradients and perturbations. No other mediator can be logically
hypothesized, much less theorized. The very same Ether of Tesla, Heaviside, C.P. Steinmetz, and even originally from Einstein before
logic fled his mind completely, was correct and remains so. Tesla outright denied our current definition of the electron as a 'discharge
particle'.

All electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect
understanding of the definition of a 'field'), these pressure gradients, or "lines" are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving
motion to the terminus 'electron'. The thermionic 'electron' contracts, pulling the 'electron', the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the
'electron'. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, in both cases these socalled
'electrons' assume radial motions, with non participating pressure gradients, or forces filling the 'voids', directing the
'electrons'. Hence, it is the so-called 'electrons' (dielectric radial discharges) that travel in straight lines, that is, radially. 'Electrons'
have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called 'electrons' are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. 'Electrons' are in
fact the resistance. From extensive experimental work into atomic electrical science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla, it is
established that the so-called electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by
the dielectric inertia in disturbance). There is no rest mass to an electron nor could there be logically, a rest-electron 'bead'; such
notions are absurd and evidence proven non-existent. The very premise is logically impossible and contradicts the rational physics of
atomic charges and discharges.

"In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to
give an account of their nature." "For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the
influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto
remained obscure to us." - Einstein on electrons; "Relativity", by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916

Ya, was hoping you might have some interesting insights like dollard; but in the incompleteness of your theory it's definitely not ready for prime-time. 
You've stated repeatedly that there is a lot of nothing to does a lot of something, and haven't even presented a quantifiable replacement for the things that already represent quantifiable effects, so the end result is, like the big bang theory it leads to no useful predictions.  I see no evidence of an electrons non existence except the words stated by you, father, so I'm afraid I can't follow your religion, and I'll attempt to refrain from dissuading others from following.