Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[MileHigh]

This thread is the state of the art in pseudoscience!

Joe is an Old Salt.  Salt dissolves in water.  Therefore Joe dissolves in water.

Isn't it obvious?

[picowatt]

As light is EM wave's,a magnetic field could indeed distort the EM wave's. But as light itself is not visible,you wouldnt see the distortion. Only what the light(EM waves) reflect off can be seen. A beam of light in a vacuum, shining at right angles to the observer, cannot be
seen,until the EM wave's hit an object that has mass,and some amount of reflective properties. An example of visible light being bent or curved,can be seen by shining a torch into a swiming pool-or the like's. Some where i remember reading about a group of science nerds,being able to get a pencil beam of light to curve around a corner,using magnets to distort the EM wave's-although it was only about 2.6* if i remember correctly. I will see if i can dig that up again. As gravity can slow down the speed of light,and even stop it if strong enough,it's not that hard to believe that a magnetic field can curve or distort light waves.

Tinman,

There are indeed magneto-optic effects.  Examples are the "Faraday effect", which relates to light passing thru a medium that changes in the presence of a magnetic field and the "magneto-optic Kerr effect", which relates to light reflecting off of a magnetized surface.  Both the Faraday and Kerr effect relate to changes to the polarization of light. 

The refractive index of some materials/fluids is polarization dependent, so it is possible to use the Faraday effect, for example, to cause the path of light to deflect/change when passing thru those materials in the presence of a magnetic field due to the change in polarization.     

Magneto-optic Kerr effect laser microscopy is used, for example, to visualize the domain structures of magnetic materials by measuring the change to the polarization of a polarized laser beam reflected off a magnetized surface.

However, to suggest that light itself can be deflected by a magnetic field is a claim that in and of itself would be quite extraordinary.  No light deflecting effects are observed in the typical 1.5T field of an MRI tunnel, nor has any such deflection  been observed at field strengths in the tens of Tesla's of research magnets.     

PW   

[steeltpu]

93rdelement   is english not your native language or are you just as stupid as the intellect sucking black hole i described?   indorse is spelled endorse.  loveing is spelled loving just to name a few basic words you can't get right.  the only thing i'll apologize for is that you didn't see the humor in my extended copy and paste from the master insult list.   it was a close fit for you anyway.  and you really don't want to threaten me or anyone else here.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Tinsh!t Koala quote:

"Not bad for someone who doesn't believe in overunity or free energy. Or did I get the wrong Kenny Wheeler again? It's a common name. "



Whatta douche bag troll...that patent is from nearly a decade ago.

Back then I didn't know what a slanderous lying sack of Shi!t this shill is either.

Life is a learning curve...likely also subject to the influence of magnetic fields.

Regards...

[93RDELEMENT]

Would it not bend if the particle that sits inside the photon is taken out ? Its not if it will its a matter of how can it be achieved ? I except what is stated but I am a simple monkey that wants to see a magnetic vortex or at least make one .... But there are people here that will blast sickening attack if you except that the photon has mass or spin to which I know it does .. All this photo electric effect that keeps popping its ugly head up here in the realm of the magnetic vortex thread is clouding the observation of such a vortex and wow they do tend to be a heavy manipulating insulting bunch .....

The photon has mass and that mass comes from somewhere ! When a neutrino hits a proton it travels straight through and a 1000 photons are emitted from the proton yet the proton loses no mass ! So it is fair to say that the mass given to the photons comes from the zero point field of space not the proton ... A photon has spin or it wont bend forgive me for stating such a simple non sophisticated fact but that's what I see . Space time curvature can bend a photon because it is increasing the spin of the photon setting up more photons emitting from the effect a simple way to conserve the energy and keep the photon at a set energy along its path ...

Why complicate it ? The geometry now seen by the photons and magnetism still need a 3rd medium to cause the reaction to happen its a bit like tin mans spinning magnet in water but is not the showing anything but spin .... The photon spin is the same as the spinning magnet that is in water but the spin of the photon is imperial not metric there for it has a natural harmonic caused by its spin ... I set up a 0.01 mm nickel coil at 8ft in length and wound it around a 2.2 inch plastic tube wound as a spiral starting at 2.2 degrees it should not pass AC current but it does and if you place it in sun light its charge increases ... Try the same with a 3inch plastic pipe and the effect does not work !!! There for the photon has a spin angle vector at 2.2 degree's imperial .

The EMF around the coil is also 2.2 degrees imperial change the system and you get nothing ...... To me I see all attempts to make a magnetic vortex as pointless unless they are attempted and designed in imperial harmonic measurements ! If a magnetic field is created at 2.2 degrees from its centre than there would be a good chance to develop a magnetic vortex as it would be in a coherent phase of angle with the fabric of space offering no resistance to the magnetic field .... 

There are no magnets made with a 2.2 degree's O D curve ! So the field will always be stuck to the magnet ! A bit like some of the egos here whom get stuck with academic mumbojumbo vodo science hahahahah The universe is a harmonic equation in imperial measurement's not metric ...


Regards

me