Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

in the ferrocell there's only a transparent substance

Those laser pics above of mine HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH FERROFLUID.

[TheoriaApophasis]

No conclusions can be drawn looking at the image presented without knowing the exact optical alignment

that statement above of yours is PURE 100% UNFILTERED DIAMOND GRADE SOPHISTRY



"well, that proves nothing, because Captain asshole of the Institute of Bullshit-U wasnt there with his DickoMeter to measure the beam deflection.........and then it wasnt..........."



Sorry, but I am, due to being a Greek translator and Platonist, an expert at seeing fallacious bullshit, and that is nothing more than PURE LIP FLAPPING BULLSHIT.


Evidence speaks volumes,

speaking is just that, lip flapping

, there should at the least be additional evidence/control experiments

YET MORE  PURE 100% UNFILTERED DIAMOND GRADE SOPHISTRY

pedal that sophistic bullshit down the road

[TheoriaApophasis]

But in all these cases it's light acting with a substance, not a field.

Thats because light/ EM is not  merely E and M,  it has a Z axis radial dielectric component.


This is where the horseshit of wave-particle duality BS comes from

This is where the correct observations and results but WRONG CONCLUSIONS of the photoelectric effect came from (from that fucking idiot Einstein who reified SPACE as something that "did stuff")



Idiot humans think they have a FIRM GRASP on the principles of the universe,   but that is UTTER bullshit.    

[picowatt]

TA,

Are you seriously taking the position that if someone were to show you a laser beam projected onto a surface and claim it proves something, that the surface profile of that surface is meaningless or unimportant?

If I showed you a similar pattern produced without a magnetic field, would you not immediately be asking what the surface profile and geometry was?

No matter, continue with the personal attacks as if that somehow  addresses or discusses any of the issues raised.

It does not...

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,

Are you seriously taking the position that if someone were to show you a laser beam projected onto a surface and claim it proves something, that the surface profile of that surface is meaningless or unimportant?

If I showed you a similar pattern produced without a magnetic field, would you not immediately be asking what the surface profile and geometry was?

Yes,.....I am sure the US PATENT OFFICE was on drugs when they gave my friend his patent on his LASER SPLITTING DEVICE that uses ELECTROMAGNETS


Go write a book proving me wrong, better yet, go do the experiments yourself.


I present the evidence, you dont have to believe a DAMN THING..............case you forgot, Im not SELLING A DAMN THING