Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,
US patent office has granted many useless patents that don't actually work.
PW

Nice premise,  true in a few cases.


However his device WORKS,  been proven to work, tested and tested again.         Or, I presume you think his history of 8 patents is proof he yet another boob who created a device and got a patent on it BEFORE fully verifying that it works.

Yeah, no.



Using A to attempt to prove that B is X,     fallacy.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Stop the presses!!!!   Kenny has "discovered" LASER speckle!

SORRY FOOL, ........but laser speckle is AS pictured below,   NOT the ones below it.


Next ..........   (idiot)


And these are only snapshots, not VIDEO

[TheoriaApophasis]

HighforMiles pontificates.....

Lets see how you "explain" (=bullshit) the picture below.     



Inventor of the LENS has stated IN REPLY  "No, WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE, YOUR TESTING METHOD OF THIS TYPE IS THE FIRST WE HAVE EVER SEEN"





I love reading elaborate bullshit to explain things people dont understand, .........so lets hear your pet (BS) theory   

[93RDELEMENT]

LASER SPECKELL ? WHAT HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA I LOVE THE TRUTH ABOUT PATENTS 80% ARE CRAP ...... WELL MY LIFE IS INDEED A PARTICLE OF GREEN LIGHT . I AM NOT THE MOST SOPHISTICATED I EXCEPT THAT BUT I AM NOT SO STUPID TO BELEAVE IN A UNIVERSE WITHOUT MASS !!! WHAT AN ASSS Hahah well done mile high and the rest to find the help the man needs hahahahahah good luck lol xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[picowatt]

Nice premise,  true in a few cases.


However his device WORKS,  been proven to work, tested and tested again.         Or, I presume you think his history of 8 patents is proof he yet another boob who created a device and got a patent on it BEFORE fully verifying that it works.

Yeah, no.



Using A to attempt to prove that B is X,     fallacy.

I said or did no such thing as in your response.  I only mentioned the patent issue because I was wondering why you feel the need to constantly bring up patents, as if that proves something or is a metric for intelligence, it does not and is not.

Again, you continue to address nothing related to the issues raised.  That's OK, no matter...

My unedited previous post follows:

TA,

Not saying this is the case here, but the US patent office has granted many useless patents that don't actually work.  it is all about proving no interference with prior art, doing a legalese dance around the claims, and paying a fee.  Is the number of patents one has been granted your new metric for intelligence?

I see no reason to doubt that your friend can modify a medium with an electromagnet such that it splits or steers a laser beam, etc.

But again, you reply as if what you say is somehow a response to the issues I raised, and again it is not.

Like you, I don't really care.

But addressing those issues or performing control experiments would indeed be good science...

PW