Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,

You know, what you make here wasting your time in contrary discussion, will not help you nor those who disagree. You waste your time explaining what they are not yet prepared to understand or even worse don't want to understand because of fear of losing all the values ​​and attributes gained in this existence. It is not so simple to reshape and redefine the entire so called reality and the own existence and relationship to everything which so far has been considered external and unrelated to our own existence. It's hard to become responsible, after centuries of irresponsibility. And on the other hand what if they will agree with you without really understand what you say? You think will help them somehow, or will help you in any way?

Help me do what? Im not selling anything,  as for any agreement, I would only be worried I was utterly wrong of some of these people (and I know their types) agreed at ALL with me.


I didnt post this thread to convince anyone of a single thing.     Let them go experiment themselves.


I have about 30 more videos to make, and about 200+ more pages to add to the book,  some stuff I would like to add now, but cannot

[pinestone]

I started reading this post on page 1 and realized it would take me all day to get here, so I just jumped ahead.
I've managed to read about 1/3rd of Ken's e-book and I agree with a lot of you...it's a tough read. Unless you're familiar with the early works of Maxwell, Faraday and Heavyside, a lot of Ken's writing and images seem ridiculous.
Ken may be using some of his own words to describe magnetic phenomenon, but his 'concepts' have been around for a long time. A rose by any other name is still a rose.
Now lets examine why an old style picture tube responds to magnetism like Ken has shown on the first couple of pages of this post. It all begins with an electron gun in the neck of the tube and a giant electrostatic potential which accelerates these electrons so they collide with phosphors on the back side of the screen. Basically, an old-school c.r.t. is a consumer-grade particle accelerator. Photons are not directly affected by magnetism, but electrons are!
When a magnetic field is introduced to a stream of electrons, they are affected by the magnets' field.

In Ken's videos we see how these electrons exhibit a chirality (right/left handedness) and how their trajectories can be altered by a magnet's polarization. The old c.r.t.'s used electromagnetic deflection coils to 'sweep' the electrons across the rear face of the screen. These sweep rates are high enough in frequency that the human eye doesn't perceive their motion (>45 Hz) and we see a picture that is really a mosaic composed from millions of tiny dots. Brightness is controlled by increasing or decreasing the accelerating voltage to the c.r.t. I won't get into color information here, but if you're interested see the wiki entry on CRT Television.
So, Ken is circumventing the built-in 'electron navigation system' (deflection coils) by introducing an external source for deflecting electrons emanating from the c.r.t.'s guns. That's why we see the 'R-G-B rainbow background' and the vortex's right or left handedness. What we see on these old c.r.t.'s is directly dependent on the strength and polarization of the applied external field and how it affects electrons flying toward a phosphor. Simple. 

Oh BTW- a word of advice to Ken. Be careful with those powerful magnets on the c.r.t.  You can warp the tiny wires that make up the 'micro-grid' inside the tube. Going to 'black' is a form of saturation which may lead to permanent damage of that old Sony-build Trinitron tube you're using for experiments.

[Acca]

 https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qYyvPB4E-A&list=UUVcxJ9k14bi__-uA1cGkEcA

Ken ..Wow !! Very good explanation !! Pushing the edge of science is not for weaklings as you have done, since heretics get executed and expelled from society it takes a fortitude of life force to defend that onslaught...and it looks like "you" have the force field  to bend the arrows from a direct attack.. Now what do I matter in the greater scheme of whole planet means nothing.. It's very humbling to realize that all humans are individuals which strive to make a mark in our own way and get dragged down the sewer by our peers who are imprinted with false beliefs to see the greater good.. Life sucks for most humans.. You did make a difference in my life..



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0s9ae0HpIZo&list=UUVcxJ9k14bi__-uA1cGkEcA


p.s..

Those magnet loopback  generators are now possible with your discovery explanation...!! Like Howard Johnson, John Bedini, and hundreds of others ..

http://pesn.com/2014/07/16/9602516_Magnetic-Energy-Systems_gets_third-party-validation_of_overunity/




Here is the latest story from China.. link below



http://peswiki.com/index.php/News:140728:Maglev_Generator_Generates_1.8_kW_Electricity_from_40_W_Input

china link ..

http://news.rti.org.tw/news/detail/?recordId=122885

http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140720000273-260114






Free energy from Sterling Allen hour about the Hutchinson effect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUK7KG4lm4Q

[TinselKoala]

I started reading this post on page 1 and realized it would take me all day to get here, so I just jumped ahead.
I've managed to read about 1/3rd of Ken's e-book and I agree with a lot of you...it's a tough read. Unless you're familiar with the early works of Maxwell, Faraday and Heavyside, a lot of Ken's writing and images seem ridiculous.
Ken may be using some of his own words to describe magnetic phenomenon, but his 'concepts' have been around for a long time. A rose by any other name is still a rose.
Now lets examine why an old style picture tube responds to magnetism like Ken has shown on the first couple of pages of this post. It all begins with an electron gun in the neck of the tube and a giant electrostatic potential which accelerates these electrons so they collide with phosphors on the back side of the screen. Basically, an old-school c.r.t. is a consumer-grade particle accelerator. Photons are not directly affected by magnetism, but electrons are!
When a magnetic field is introduced to a stream of electrons, they are affected by the magnets' field.

In Ken's videos we see how these electrons exhibit a chirality (right/left handedness) and how their trajectories can be altered by a magnet's polarization. The old c.r.t.'s used electromagnetic deflection coils to 'sweep' the electrons across the rear face of the screen. These sweep rates are high enough in frequency that the human eye doesn't perceive their motion (>45 Hz) and we see a picture that is really a mosaic composed from millions of tiny dots. Brightness is controlled by increasing or decreasing the accelerating voltage to the c.r.t. I won't get into color information here, but if you're interested see the wiki entry on CRT Television.
So, Ken is circumventing the built-in 'electron navigation system' (deflection coils) by introducing an external source for deflecting electrons emanating from the c.r.t.'s guns. That's why we see the 'R-G-B rainbow background' and the vortex's right or left handedness. What we see on these old c.r.t.'s is directly dependent on the strength and polarization of the applied external field and how it affects electrons flying toward a phosphor. Simple. 

Oh BTW- a word of advice to Ken. Be careful with those powerful magnets on the c.r.t.  You can warp the tiny wires that make up the 'micro-grid' inside the tube. Going to 'black' is a form of saturation which may lead to permanent damage of that old Sony-build Trinitron tube you're using for experiments.

That is a great description of what MileHigh, Picowatt, Tinman, I and a few other readers here know, and can use to engineer new stuff that actually works.  It seems to be something that is beyond Aryasattvan's grasp, though.
Now, you skipped ahead, so you probably missed all those passages where some of us took your position in attempts at rational discussion.  We were repaid by insults and disrespect of the worst kind. I don't wonder at all how he will respond to your explanation. Because you see, he is better than all of us, combined.

[tinman]

Message to Tin man ! The 93rd element is a group of 93 scientists I being negative hydrogen and claim it as the 93 element but I am open to any counter claims AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND AND POLITE MOMENT OF TRUTH THAT YOU SHARE EVERY TIME YOU SPEAK YOU SIR ARE A REAL KNOCK ON THE DOOR OF REALITY WE THANK YOU  !


Regards

93rd element



 



   

Cheers 93rd element.