Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

TA,

How in the heck is using the word "domain" as it is defined a circular fallacy?

What "word" would you use to describe "a region within a magnetic material which has uniform magnetization"?

Are you trying to rewrite the English language too?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,

How in the heck is using the word "domain" as it is defined a circular fallacy?

What "word" would you use to describe "a region within a magnetic material which has uniform magnetization"?

words and descriptions are as useful as a picture of a cooked turkey to a starving person,  dont you get it?



Try explanations.     To say a  "region is a domain" IS a circular fallacy


The world is full of F*cking descriptions. .........................  I can get a 10 year old to tell me "magnets pull/ push on earth other"


That however is 100% USELESS

[picowatt]

TA,

Trying to have a conversation with you is like two parties arguing about what shape the meeting table should be.

You apparently can't even agree on a common language to use without invoking your ire.  Your post makes no sense.

Fortunately, the technically inclined people I deal with daily have agreed on a common language to use that is filled with technical jargon and definitions we all agree on.  (We also treat each other with respect...)

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,

Trying to have a conversation with you is like two parties arguing about what shape the meeting table should be.
You apparently can't even agree on a common language

language isnt the issue, COMPREHENSION IS...........   descriptions are for fools.     Explanations are for the wise.


I dont care if you call it a domain OR dog poo.    That isnt the point.

Fortunately, the technically inclined people I deal with daily have agreed on a common language to use that is filled with technical jargon and definitions we all agree on.  (We also treat each other with respect...)

I know MANY LANGUAGES,   you?

Technical jargon is fine, and its aluminum...................., comprehension is GOLD

[Acca]

Ken as you have flipped my world of magnet terminiolgy and now I am grasping (slow) at the postulates.  Now even if magnetism is such a thing ? 
You did shake up (earthquake) my ****** (blank) and it's time get those postulates proven in a for profit device, (weapon that is a (electron ??) destabilizer of charge and discharge potential) matter (matter electron field)... It "seems" that your postulated of electron matter may have found the answer as to the destabilization of (atomic bonds) electron matter.. John Hutchinson has proof that destabilization of electron matter (atomic bonds) is made through weak dielectric (magnetism).. I just would have to guess as what your postulates may mean in the battle for the best weapon and that is, that a weapon made of matter is now obsolete....

Looks like the more dense the material (metal) the better the effect.. However if matter electron field is in fact matter, then the dooms day weapon is possible.. Hutchnison effect is this effect on the "magnetic makeup" of matter..  If RF is used in combination with a dielectric (electrostatic charge) and matter is magnetism, then it also answers my enigma of paulis exclusion principle (means that the repulsive distance is shorter due to an attractive electrostatic charge) in my metal magnetic repulsion of small spheres....by that is my discovery.. monetized already..

J.Hutchinson effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-YwbgXpnkA

[/font]
This episode's featured guest was the one and only, John Hutchinson. We discussed several things that point to a variant of the Hutchinson Effect being deployed on September 11, 2001 to bring down not just WTC 1, 2, and 7, but also 3, 4, some of 5 and most of 6. In addition to demolition explosives such as thermite, even more exotic technology seems to have been in play to turn the buildings to dust so that by the time they "fell", there was virtually no rubble pile.
[/font]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUK7KG4lm4Q


[/font]