Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

Then why do we even bother to use Faradays law of electromagnetic induction (which works out quite well), and apparently erroneously, also include rate as that law is defined?


"The law of physics describing the process of electromagnetic induction is known as Faraday's law of induction and the most widespread version of this law states that the induced electromotive force in any closed circuit is equal to the RATE of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit."

So again, is the alignment of magnetic moments in a pre-magnet by a magnetizer RATE dependent.

Yes or no?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

Then why do we even bother to use Faradays law of electromagnetic induction (which works out quite well), and apparently erroneously, also include rate as that law is defined?


"The law of physics describing the process of electromagnetic induction is known as Faraday's law of induction and the most widespread version of this law states that the induced electromotive force in any closed circuit is equal to the RATE of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit."

PW

HINT HINT:   Magnetism has a time variable,  Dielectricity DOES NOT, its time variable is ONLY as pertains to the rate at which induction can OCCUR, but that doesnt mean dielectricity HAS a time variable, only a rate of induction variable in the electrical system it is part of.


the rate at which the electric field is moving is the limiting factor, not the dielectric field or charge itself.


transverse or polarized components are definitionally PERFECT with working with Faradays law.




HINT:  the world knows MOST things about electricity, ................and  ALMOST JACK SHIT NOTHING about DIELECTRICITY




In case you forget, its called  "electrical THEORY"  for a reason.......not "electrical FACTS"      ROFL!!!!!






Time to experiment, enough LIP FLAPPING BULLSHIT  (for now)





"Magnetism is the dielectric field" – Michael Faraday

"Magnetism is the discharge Ether modality of dielectricity in termination. Dielectricity is counterspatial, magnetism is spatial. All radiation, all discharges in the universe are spatial by nature and definition. Magnetism, therefore is the necessitated polarized (creates space) co-eternal conjugate to dielectricity. Electricity terminates AS magnetism , not INTO magnetism, by losing its dielectric component as necessitated; electricity is the product of Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity), is definitionally a hybrid Ether modality of the product of Phi and Psi." - Author

[d3x0r]

@TA
"electricity is the product of Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity)"


But you keep saying there is no magnetism, it's just a radiation of dielectricity... so should easily be able to substitute that f(Psi) * psi = Q where F(x) is the translation function of psi into phi...


so the whole basis you keep quoting about electricity is wrong.

[TinselKoala]

1. PW saw the pic 4 pages ago.......


2. he said he could "EASILY" explain it


3. He did not

4. He HAS NOT


5. CAN YOU?





No tricks, 2 magnets, and a steel ring (could be a square or disk, doesnt matter)

Of course I can. It's another photo of your magnet play, demonstrating something else YOU don't understand but are trying to use as "evidence" for your delusional framework.

Now let's see you provide the proper reference citations for the claims you have made. Oh... that's right, you graduated before they taught you how to make a proper reference citation. And of course you have no references to cite to back up your claims.

Here, explain this:

[gravityblock]

TA,

So you do agree then, that the mechanism you propose, must obey Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction?
(just as those wireless power transfer systems do)

That is, your "electrical induction" method must be RATE dependent.

PW

The mechanism proposed by TA does not have to obey Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, for it has been invalidated by the spiral experiments as shown in the publication, titled "Electromagnetic Induction and the Conservation of Momentum in the Spiral Paradox".  The conducting spiral allows us to see that unipolar induction is produced by a vortex of charges, confirming the Lorentz Force and invalidating Faraday's Induction Law, furthermore it allows us to see the true origin of electromagnetic induction and its dual nature. In the conducting spiral, an inversion of cause and effect in the description of electromagnetism also becomes evident.  The emf and torque of the Faraday Disc and the conducting spiral is due to the continuous variation of the electromagnetic angular moment of the continuous current.

Gravock