Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TinselKoala]

What, no musical soundtrack?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxEpSX2Hd54

[TinselKoala]

Since we are doing puzzles, here's one more for you. Explain this system from end to end. IR photoemitter/detector, processed by an Arduino to display on an LCD screen the RPM of the magnetically levitated, electrostatically powered motor running at close to 5000 rpm, with a NE-2 neon in series with the supply to the motor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVfw-TeJ9r4

I am quite certain that both MileHigh and Picowatt can explain this system completely and coherently in terms that would allow any competent third person to replicate it and improve upon it. I am also quite certain that the Greatest Buddhist Scientist cannot do the same. But I am always willing to be _proven wrong_.










Unlike some other people we encounter here from time to time.

[MileHigh]

Kenny:

Your pictures with he smaller cylindrical neo magnet only confirm what I was saying before.  In this case you can see how the ring on the side is offset from the horizontal center line of the magnet.  That means that gravity has pulled the ring "up" the magnetic hill until the force of gravity is balanced by the "down hill" pull of the magnetic potential well.  At a certain point the "steepness" of the hill pulls against the force of gravity so that they are in balance.

In other words, the ring sits at the bottom of the (magnetic + gravitational) potential well.

Okay, so you have showed us a kind of Lagrange point for one magnet and a ring of metal sitting at the bottom of a magneto-gravitational well.

You showed us some pictures of a big magnets with smaller magnets and metal pieces stuck on the big magnets.  So what is the point that you are trying to make?

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

Since we are doing puzzles, here's one more for you.

I asked you first,  you said the answer was "EASY"







you never answered it

[TheoriaApophasis]

Your pictures with he smaller cylindrical neo magnet only confirm what I was saying before.  In this case you can see how the ring on the side is offset from the horizontal center line of the magnet.  That means that gravity has pulled the ring "up" the magnetic hill until the force of gravity is balanced by the "down hill" pull of the magnetic potential well.  At a certain point the "steepness" of the hill pulls against the force of gravity so that they are in balance.

Except I can use a 3/4" long Neo at N42 and achieve the same as this 5/8" N50  Neo.


Gravity yes, but the field geometry is much tighter on higher gauss magnets............If you had a magnetometer, you would see this,  3 TESLA PYRAMID STACKED MAGNETS  have an extremely SHALLOW high-gauss field

look up youtube user "SUPERMAGNETMAN" and see his stacked 3 TESLA  pyramid magnet arrays made for medical testing

no power, just permanent magnets up to 3 TESLAS

In other words, the ring sits at the bottom of the (magnetic + gravitational) potential well.

Okay, so you have showed us a kind of Lagrange point for one magnet and a ring of metal sitting at the bottom of a magneto-gravitational well.

........Descriptions are not explanations.

You showed us some pictures of a big magnets with smaller magnets and metal pieces stuck on the big magnets.  So what is the point that you are trying to make?

That you still did not, still cannot explain it, is pretty much the point.


If you cannot explain 2 magnets and a steel ring .....>>>>>>with NO AC / DC power, no converters, no wires NOTHING<<<<<<....................................well then.............







Sok though, Feynman couldnt explain how magnets work either,   HUBRIS is a dirty WH0RE with AIDS.    ......... Academia spreads it like free peanut butter in a BREAD FACTORY





more examples below, this time steel disk , steel ring, and magnetic disk