Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SeVWSO_wpg

Saw your CRAP video, ......yes, of course it works with a steel disk, and ONE magnet.


LET ME QUOTE YOUR VIDEO::::::
The upper object here isn't even a metal or ferrite magnet. It is one of those flexible "rubber magnets"


WHAT THE F**K???   you said:::      "this object isnt a  magnet, .......it a magnet"      ROFL!!!!!!!




You left OUT THE IMPORTANT PART, demon seed, the steel disk is still under MAGNETIC INDUCTION and therefore still under gyromagnetic precession


also called the LARMOR FREQUENCY





By the way, I LOVE THOSE LONG DIRTY LONG GROSS NASTY fingernails you have  (Is that you Smeagol??)     



Video 1 EXPLAINS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVw3xhPZywc

Video 2 REPLICATES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlMYTL_6hA0

[TheoriaApophasis]

The direction of spin is completely predicted by the vectors and the resulting couple, and has nothing to do with magnet polarity or magnetism at all. 

Here we have 2 objects, either 2 "magnets", ..........or 1 magnet and a STEEL or FERRITE disk under magnetic induction.


Captain Goof however (above) says>>>>>>>>> ..................has nothing to do magnetism at all. 



Shut down the high school you dropped out of , you didnt get your "learn on" . 

[tinman]

It almost amazes me that people can't figure out these types of clips.  For me it's a case where I almost don't even have to think.  Almost the instant I lay eyes on something like this I have the answer as to how it works.  Plus in this case this "phenomenon" surfaced with the so-called Minato wheel years ago.  It also should have "surfaced" if you played with Smarties (or M&M candies) as a kid.

I just thought I would throw it up here MH.it is interesting watching the responses.
Im well aware of how it works, and the same thing can be seen using a spining top on a convex surface-it will even climb to the peak of the lenz all by itsell.

[d3x0r]

Your drawing pretty much captures the true state of affairs although your description is a bit off. This phenomenon actually has nothing to do with magnetism per se, the magnetism is just what pulls the items together and makes the point pivot contact. The device will work just fine even with only one magnet and a smooth flat piece of steel. The rotation arises because of the force couple: the point of contact provides a pivot and a frictional drag that combines with the off-center pull to produce a rotation.

This is a True Experiment, not a demonstration. Note how the DUT responds as the input parameters are varied through a rationally chosen parameter space, testing a couple of hypotheses. Note also that the top item is not a metallic magnet at all. The lens is held level. Note how the upper object's behaviour changes when it is at the top of the lens and all the various force vectors align: there is no spinning couple at that location, whereas when the upper object is down on the slope of the lens, these vectors no longer align and a rotational torque develops as the object is dragged along the surface by the lower magnet. The direction of spin is completely predicted by the vectors and the resulting couple, and has nothing to do with magnet polarity or magnetism at all. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SeVWSO_wpg

Kinetimatics is the word I was looking for.
... my argument(bet) was that if it was held it upside down it would spin the other direction... but ... the force keeps it so the point of contact is toward the outside of the convex surface from the center of rotation even when upside down.  Your demo might be different.  I have some just metal plates maybe I can get it to work with a ceramic magnet and rotate backwards upside down... which would move the point of contact towards the center of the convex lens instead of being on the outside.
@TA it has nothing to do with magnetics, it has to do with the point of contact on the lens from the object on top of the convex lens vs its center of mass.  Although without the magnet it is hard to make it clamp to the curved surface.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I just thought I would throw it up here MH.it is interesting watching the responses.
Im well aware of how it works, and the same thing can be seen using a spining top on a convex surface-it will even climb to the peak of the lenz all by itsell.

that is STILL precession however.


Yes, ive done the same before, but the gyro only climbs IF you spin it CW (looking down on the flywheel), and inverse CCW, it goes downhill


however I used a convex book when I did it, dosent matter if its a lens or not