Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[orbut 3000]

TouretteAphophis was a little surprised that his new theory of everything and the kitchen sink wasn't exactly met with overwhelming enthusiasm and praise from the uneducated masses. Maybe, he thought, the presentation was just too data laden and humble to be appreciated by those childlike imbeciles he chose to talk to.


(Image)

[TheoriaApophasis]

That's where you are broadcasting out to the world that you have a psychological disorder.  You seemingly can't make a distinction between a speculation that I am making about someone else and my own thoughts.  Or else, you are fully aware of the distinction but you make a posting like that anyway because in a quasi psychopathic way you believe the spin is more important then the logic of the argument and your own credibility.

Either way, it does not bode well in terms of your mental health.

ad hominem, and doesnt address the point.   


The LIE you and the other fools were taught that "ATOMS are 99.99999999%  EMPTY SPACE" is        100.99999999% ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT

[TheoriaApophasis]

TouretteAphophis was a little surprised that his new theory of everything and the kitchen sink wasn't exactly met with overwhelming enthusiasm

Actually it has been.    Im sick of the FLOOD of emails.



In case you forgot, the book has had several 100 thousand downloads already.

In case you forgot,  I dont care what anyone thinks.


IM NOT SELLING ANYTHING TO ANYONE.      ......... I neither want anyones MONEY  nor RESPECT   


"wisdom and discovery are their own rewards"-  Damascius

[orbut 3000]

In case you forgot,  I dont care what anyone thinks.

So... if you don't care, why do you care?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Apparently in agreement with that, you then spoke of electrical induction

Lets get YOU some education, son, Electricity = PHI X PSI ............magnetism times dielectricity.

Spacetime is the conjugate hybrid interaction of Magnetism and Dielectricity and their mutual transformation into Electric Power and Energy. Frequency gives rise to energy, this in Plancks per second.

Unlike magnetism the energy is forced or compressed inwards rather than outwards. Dielectric lines of force push inward into internal space and along axis, rather than pushed outward broadside to axis as in the magnetic field. Because the lines are mutually repellent certain amounts of broadside or transverse motion can be expected but the phenomena is basically longitudinal. This gives rise to an interesting paradox that will be noticed with capacity. This is that the smaller the space bounded by the conducting structure the more energy that can be stored. This is the exact opposite of magnetism


Dielectricity is the Ether under torsion and torque at its inertial plane; magnetism is a spatial circular reciprocating vortex, an Etheric 'pair' of fountains and countersinks. Electricity is the dynamic radial or reciprocating polarization of the Ether.

I remain confused as to what

I remain confused as to WHY you dont know that electricity is a HYBRID of magnetism and dielectricity

In my earlier posts, I have already discussed the error in thinking, or at least stating, that a magnetizer discharges large currents directly thru the poles of a pre-magnet.  Apparently in agreement with that, you then spoke of electrical induction

Now, son, tell us  the difference between ELECTRICITY and DIELECTRICITY   

     Maxwell's discovery of a factor of proportionality between dielectricity and magnetism led to his theory of conjugate pair of inductions, dielectric and magnetic, in union, propagating at the velocity of light through the "Luminiferous Aether". Hence, electro-magnetic waves in free space, unbounded by gross physical matter, mass free energy. This propagation is within the dielectric, or aetheric, medium itself. It is free of so-called "charge carriers" (electrons), a mass-less form of electricity. This concept had a very powerful impact upon the scientific and philosophical thoughts of Maxwell's era. So here begins the notion of "wireless", the transmission of electricity without wires or other guiding structures. Leading up to the work of Heinrich Hertz, 1857 to 1894, the wireless transmission of electricity had found experimental verification by Joseph Henry, and Elihu Thompson. It even was patented by M. Loomis. These examples however were not electro-magnetic, they were electro-static (dielectric). Heinrich Hertz provided the first complete laboratory demonstration of the transmission of electricity through "free space", (across the room). This was instantly considered proof of the Maxwell theory of electro-magnetism, and electro-magnetic waves. When Nikola Tesla engaged in the experiments of Hertz, he found these waves not to be completely electromagnetic. The early death of Hertz prevented any further progress. However "the world view" kept hold of its belief that "Hertzian" waves are only transverse E. M. waves, the two distinctions now synonymous

as if that is what you actually meant to say (and which you also supported by posting the images of a wireless transmission system).  I postulated that if electrical current induced into the pre-magnet via induction was the actual mechanism utilized by a magnetizer, that it would seem logical to expect that the RATE at which the magnetizer's field was applied should affect the strength of the field achieved in the pre-magnet, with a faster rise/fall time producing a stronger field (i.e., dV/dt).

You never read  MAXWELL on the "RATE".......suggest you READ SAME........

Faraday was the originator of the concept of =the magnetic field, (which is described in terms of "magnetic curves" our present day "magnetic lines of force") however HE NEVER SO MUCH AS SUGGESTED in his works that induced currents were a resultant of changing magnetic fields. ON THE CONTRARY, he clearly associated the phenomena of electromagnetic induction with changing electrical currents.

As per Maxwell, he TOO considered EM induction as a phenomena in which a current (or EM force) is induced in a circuit. but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field. He CLEARLY said tha the induced EM force is "MEASURED BY, not CAUSED BY the changing mag field"   

Just as Faraday, he made NO allusion to ANY CAUSAL link between magnetic and electric fields


----- Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko

Now what about your goddamn "RATE"?


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Time is applicable to MAGNETISM MORON.................NOT DIELECTRICITY,   Spacetime is a vector of polarized FIELDS............not radial ones


FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time
2) Space
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism
Every other relation, quantity, or expression, Volt, Amp, Ohm, etc. is
derived from these FOUR dimensions. Time and Space are the metrical
dimensions; Dielectricity and Magnetism are the physical dimensions. It is
that basic!

As I said I would, I spoke with a magnetizer engineer

I dont give a FUCK who you talked to,  hes a MONKEY that pushes buttons     


How goddamn DUMB are you?