Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: d3x0r on August 07, 2014, 10:43:38 PM
since magnets are so obviously static,


WHAT THE HELL?????????     


Nothing in the universe is LESS STATIC  than magnetism.         You just said "static radiation"     :o :o :o :o :o :o


gyromagnetic precession,  reciprocating  DIVERGENT centrifugal fields creating space and  POLARIZED



When you find a "Static magnet" , let me know  OMG.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: d3x0r on August 07, 2014, 10:43:38 PM
electrets are such high resistance they do not generate continuous magnetic fields so must be applied and removed from a circuit... much like a magnet must be applied and removed from a circuit to get useful dielectric work from them.

Your praise dollard so; and yet he represents the full picture of maxwell as being both dielectric and magnetic... if one were the other you wouldn't need phi and psi... you would just need psi and a function of psi to get plank.
A capacitor is a dielectric device and has little magnetic effects.
An inductor is a magnetic device and has little dielectric effects.




A capacitor is a dielectric device and has little magnetic effects...........no shit, an UNDISCHARGED  charge is going to have low to NILL DISCHARGE (magnetism)


An inductor is POWERED by dielectricity, so thats BS.




Your praise dollard so; and yet he represents the full picture of maxwell as being both dielectric and magnetic.<<<


Longitudinal dielectrics without an (apparent) magnetic component you mean.


Six Fundamental Types of Waves: First set: TEM (transverse electro magnetic) Waves: 1. TE – Transverse Electric (Dielectric) 2. TM – Transverse Magnetic 3. TEM – Transverse dielectro-electromagnetic with dielectric as the longitudinal coaxial Z-axis.
Second set: Longitudinal waves: 1. LD - Longitudinal Dielectric 2. LM - Longitudinal Magneto 3. LMD - Longitudinal magneto Dielectric.

Electricity is comprised of two components
1. Dielectricity – Generated by a capacitor, counter-space phenomena; storage and return of dielectric energy.
2. Magnetism –Generated by a coil of wire, decaying electricity, spatial phenomena; storage and return of magnetic energy; electro-motor force; lines per second.
Electromagnetic induction – time & magnetism; produces melting; radiation. Dielectric Induction – Brighter light, no melting, higher frequency, less power usage, blue spark, growth and generation.

Electrical Engineering has four primary dimensions
Metric
1) time, t, second
2) space, l, centimeter
Field
3) magnetism, , Weber
4) dielectricity, , Coulomb

Dielectric field = Phi/LxT  (Weber per centimeter-second)
Magnetic field = Psi/LxT (Coulombs per centimeter-second)
Electromagnetic induction: E (volts) = Phi/time 
Magneto-dielectric induction: I (Amps) = Psi/time

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: d3x0r on August 07, 2014, 10:43:38 PM
I appreciate the devotion you have to your ideals... but you're trying to make a normal dirail train work as a monorail.



Just the opposite,  I am saying it IS a monorail.     Charge-discharge are the Principle-attribute of ONE ENTITY


If you want complicated bullshit, you need look no further than the goddamn CULT OF QUANTUM


muons, glouns, photons, electrons, negative momentum particles,   "virtual particles"


Its a fucking pseudo-scientific religion looking for Unicorn particles.      They create and invent NOTHING,   They convolute the ever-loving SHIT out of a simplex system of 4 Ether modalities


dielectricity magnetism (discharge)

electricity (Phi and Psi)

and matter/Gravity (a hybrid condensate of dielectricity).



TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on August 07, 2014, 10:45:12 PM
I also believe the great minds of the past, including those you both praise and disrespect, would be amazed at where we currently are technologically and how we have used and improved upon their discoveries since their time.



This is where your brain REALLY TAKES A FLUSH down the crapper


A: they would be amazed at the TECH we have


B: THEY WOULD DIE WITH HORROR TO LEARN that we only learned how to INTELLIGENTLY manipulate shit into TECH, without understanding what is going on.




USING shit to create complex shit, is intelligence


KNOWING what the hell is going on at the fundamental level is a WHOLE OTHER THING.


Its STILL CALLED "Electrical THEORY" for a good godddamn fucking reason  ;D ;D ;D    :o :o



Illiterate CHINESE WOMEN build Iphones in China,  they have NO IDEA how they work.



Whats more the people that DESIGNED said device ALSO (like yourself) have NO FUCKING CLUE the difference between  Electricity and Dielectricity


nor the "difference" between saying  "negative charge" (BS)  and   "discharge" 

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on August 07, 2014, 11:01:13 PM
But you have stated previously that some electrical means, i.e., cap discharge, is required to make one type of magnet and a that a PM can only be used to make another.

Resultant GAUSS ratings of 2 magnets, one from coherency of dielectricity and one from coherency and INCREASE in capacitance are

Quantitatively (temporarily) the same and
QUALITATIVELY wholly different.

Its like your ass doesnt get the diff. between 2 VW Bugs , both of which will max out at 100 MPH, but the other with a larger C.I. engine  :o


Quote from: picowatt on August 07, 2014, 11:01:13 PM
the process used to "magnetize" them makes no difference. 

dielectric coherency achieved in GAUSS is not the same (AT ALL) as GAUSS achieved by INCREASED capacitance and coherency.


The only thing manipulated is dielectricity,.......one is increased, the other is NOT.




Quote from: picowatt on August 07, 2014, 11:01:13 PM
As long as the magnetic field (oersteds) applied to the poles of the pre-magnet are similar,

Magnetism doesnt create magnets  , applied induced magnetic fields cause dielectric coherency.   Magnetism displaces, NOT attracts 




Quote from: picowatt on August 07, 2014, 11:01:13 PM
the source of the magnetic field or the rate at which it is applied is unimportant (as long as the rate is slow enough to prevent inducing unwanted levels of eddy currents).
No, I don't get it.  Your analogy makes no sense.


Tell that shit to NASA............ask them why they want  N45 GAUSS  NEOS or somarium cobalt in their devices and NOT FUCKING N45 Gauss  FERRITE


Yes, I know you dont get it.