Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

wrong again, ....  what you MEAN TO SAY is there is  ELECTRIFICATION off a magnet sitting on a desk
No, both are in a static state and there is no electrification.

Its 100% insane to state that divergent radiation, magnetism is "in a static state".

10,000% padded room INSANITY. 

No motion involved.... you're changing parameters
(yes everything is moving, but magnetic induction in a coil requires relative motion to each other

A: there is already moving magnetism as its nature, AND gyromagnetic precession
B: AND also physical space and time movement OF the magnet.

So, absurd.

You forget that magnetism being Spatial and dielectricity being radial
Magnetism and dielectricity are always, as is their nature, in conjugate relative "motion" due to magnetism having an enormous time differential that the dielectric doesnt have.  So , wrong again.

this is how Tesla was able to propagate longitudinal dielectric transmissions at (what was it again?) 3.6X  C

... even though we go around the galaxy some  483,000 miles per hour{a  6 ft wheel needs to turn at  187,312 RPM to go that fast on its circumferance...} doesn't matter if they aren't moving relative to each other  ... "and how fast is the Milky Way Galaxy moving? The speed turns out to be an astounding 1.3 million miles per hour" )

Haaa!!!!  Now you need to look into Galactic JETS and see what is going on at the center.

moving magnetism in space causes dielectricity; I'll agree... changing dielectric field in time causes magnetism...
I cannot guarantee that you can move in space without moving in time, since a motion is dp/dt which involves automatically 2 quantities
a changing dielectric field does not occur in space, but only in time... longitudinal... and results in a magnetic field in space.

There is no such thing as "JUST magnetism".     Go show me JUST MAGNETISM autonomously.  Doesnt exist.  Its a posterior discharge to "X".

I suppose you'll argue there's anti-space (counter-space) which is where the supposed dielectric charge is discharging to... but what replenishes the charge?  something from a 3rd anti-space?

Dont go down that Quantum BS road.

THE GREEKS KNEW ABOUT counterspace

The Romans KNEW ABOUT counterspace

leonardo da vinci DREW and KNEW ABOUT counterspace

The Egyptians KNEW ABOUT counterspace

Where you think the Ether was?   IN space?   There is nothing "in space",   Space is created by fields.  The one word----- Fields---- is the ONE SINGLE EVIL "F*CK YOU" word that Physics HAS NEVER, and WILL NEVER DEFINE

Go scare a Quantum Prick ......ask him like a child  "define the term FIELD for me"     




The Ether is a circle whose center is every'where' and whose circumference is NO'where'.



>>>>>>Why can't a electrostatic field exist without magnetism? 

Electrostatic fields  ARE magnetism   ROFL.       Longitudinal dielectricity is another matter. Which is why it is SUPERLUMINAL

"Magnetism is the dielectric (electrostatics) field" - Faraday


>>>>>>>>>>>If there is no electron, then there's no reason to think that the super conducting

Youre confusing a CONDUCTOR with an INSULATOR     

http://journal.borderlands.com/1987/the-fallacy-of-conductors/


My Yttrium-barium-copper-oxide disk IS NOT A SUPERCONDUCTOR, it is a SUPER-DIAMAGNETIC INSULATOR   

[gravityblock]

(yes everything is moving, but magnetic induction in a coil requires relative motion to each other... even though we go around the galaxy some  483,000 miles per hour{a  6 ft wheel needs to turn at  187,312 RPM to go that fast on its circumferance...} doesn't matter if they aren't moving relative to each other  ... "and how fast is the Milky Way Galaxy moving? The speed turns out to be an astounding 1.3 million miles per hour" )

Magnetic induction in a wire does not require relative motion.  In 1988 Prof Francisco J. Muller completed a series of experiments, substituting Faraday's rotating disk and magnet by a filamentary circuit, one portion of which is immersed in a magnetic field (inside a gap between ceramic magnets) while the other remains outside the magnetic field. (The field is confined within iron plates).  By introducing a capacitive branch he could demonstrate that the induction occurs, indeed, in the wire that moves with the magnet, without need of relative motion. A variation of the experiment in rectilinear fashion makes this anti-relativistic conclusion totally unavoidable, invalidating the recourse to General Relativity. A list of other publications by Muller can be found at the World Science Database.

For the rotational case in Figure 1 there is a potential difference induced between O and R due to the ABSOLUTE ROTATION of the system, in-spite of the absence of relative motion between the magnet and wire.  In Figure 1, all of the velocities are parallel or tangential to the magnetic edges.  For the translational case in Figure 2 there is no induction between O and R.  In figure 2, the B field is the same, the speeds also are similar, and no relative motion exists as in Figure 1. Why the difference?

In Figure 1, all of the velocities are parallel or tangential to the magnetic edges.  In figure 2, most of the velocities have components perpendicular to those edges.  As a result, in Figure 2 the edges of the magnet produce magnetic "storms" by motion through space (an absolute effect) which are equivalent to negative (VxB) effects.  The latter cancels the positive (VxB) fields thus yielding zero net induction.

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

but just moving a magnetic field in space without time should cause induction; again conversely to changing a dielectric field in time and no space....

Nobody on earth has EVER just "moved a magnetic field"  ,  theyve DISPLACED ONE with reflector and directors.


A "moving magnet" is also moving the dielectric inertial plane.


So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   




See this pic below, those BRIGHT CROSSING POINTS are electricity,   Phi x Psi = Q / Electrification

[d3x0r]

VIDEO uploading now, all those BLURRED smears where the dielectric meets the magnetic in a MOVING MAGNET is electrification
move any magnet in space and time, and its magnetic interacts with its dielectric
see example of same "blurs" below.
its not "my view", its empirically measurable electricity .....,  however obviously, moving a magnet slowly by HAND is not going to POWER anything.

That's what you're proposing, now prove it has power.  prove that THAT point has power.    But again you're moving, and a ferromagnet and ferroelectric can maintain a magnetic field and electric field themeselves without motion.  And a ferroelectric has no magnetic field, and a ferromagnet has no electric field.  Moving one in time and the other space can join and entangle and form electricity, which may then be fed back to a dielectric storage or inductive storage... and again become magnetic and/or dielectric.


Moving a magnet by hand certainly can power things...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEu1lBYZKXI (ultra short clip, moving magnet, and actually lighting LEDs... I should loop it 10 times or something so it's not just 2 seconds *don't blink* )
Oh you said slowly... well just need a bigger (Better) coil... that one is actually fairly scramble-wound.




A magnet alone is not electricity.  (without a change in space) If you had a moving dielectric intermingled with magnetic, you would have electricity, and a magnet is not electricity.
Just as a capacitor alone is not electricity.  (without a change in time)


Mind you a few posts ago I mentioned that the word 'electricity' changed in meaning over time, and what was meant by 'electricity'.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology_of_electricity
"The term quantity of electricity was once common in scientific publications. It appears frequently in the writings of Franklin, Faraday, Maxwell, Millikan, and J. J. Thomson, and was even occasionally used by Einstein.However, over the last hundred years the term "electricity" has been used by electric utility companies and the general public in a non-scientific way. Today the vast majority of publications no longer refer to electricity as meaning electric charge. Instead they speak of electricity as electromagnetic energy. The definition has drifted even further, and many authors now use the word "electricity" to mean electric current (amperes), energy flow (watts), electrical potential (volts), or electric force. Others refer to any electrical phenomena as kinds of electricity.
These multiple definitions are probably the reason that Quantity of Electricity has fallen into disfavor among scientists. Physics textbooks no longer define Quantity of Electricity or Flow of Electricity. Quantity of electricity is now regarded as an archaic usage, and it has slowly been replaced by the terms charge of electricity, then quantity of electric charge, and today simply charge. Since the term electricity has increasingly become corrupted by contradictions and unscientific definitions, today's experts instead use the term charge to remove any possible confusion"

I prefer Dollard's terminology from lone pine writings... (included a few posts ago, because when I got it, it was free.)
"For the Electricity extant between a pair of wires in your lamp cord, the
closer the wires, the more capacitance, and thus the more Dielectricity.
Conversely, for the same cord, the farther apart the wires, the more
inductance and thus the more Magnetism. Therefore it is seen that the
smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be
stored, and conversely the larger the space between the wires (the more
real estate) the more Magnetism that can be stored. Very simple, do not let
your mind make it any more complicated than that!

Now let us reach out for a few quantitative relations: The product (line,
cross, or dot – unrestricted) of the total amount of Dielectricity multiplied
by the total amount of Magnetism (when both are in union) gives the total
quantity of Electricity. We will call this quantity of Electricity the letter "Q"
and name this "The Planck" after Max Planck."

-----
Reviewing LPW a little more; Dollard does not go as far to say there are variants in space without variant in time... so every term involves time.
Dielectricity operates in time... and because a wire itself has dielectric character, it is inescapable to have time... but pure induction should require no time... Quantum entanglement for instance.

"SPECIAL NOTE: These various groupings of coefficients exist in distinct,
independent, time frames. The dissipation coefficients are the result of
random molecular variations, that is, noise. The consumption coefficients
are harmonic in nature, relating to the operating frequencies, likewise for
the production coefficients. The random and the harmonic time functions
are NOT ADDITIVE. In general, the combinations of these coefficients
appear as versor sums. More on this later."

which is how he ends up avoid square-seconds... because he defines time multiplication as addition, which leaves seconds as seconds.... rather than recognizing he's got an extra term of seconds.... Hmmm

It is logically hard to conceive of a motion without time since so few things teleport and cover space without time.

[gravityblock]

See this pic below, those BRIGHT CROSSING POINTS are electricity,   Phi x Psi = Q / Electrification

Those bright crossing points is where the edges of the magnet induce magnetic "storms" by motion through space while they disconnect/reconnect where they touch with the vortex of the magnet.

Reference:  How to tie a knot in a bubble ring.  The video found on the reference link is awsum!

Gravock