Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

vortex is a spinning magnet

I made no such claim, son.   Run along.


wrap your brain around---   COMPOUNDED FIELD MOVEMENT AND RECIPROCATION



Magnetism is reciprocating in a STILL, PHYSICAL "MAGNET" sitting on the table.

Magnetism, in COMPOUND, moved in space and time by moving a physical magnet ......and coupling off this Ether perturbation.



1. something (field) in that still physical object is always reciprocating  / SPINNING
2. ROTATE the physical object in space and time in what is ALREADY and ALWAYS reciprocating / spinning at its field-level
3. Use a dielectric reflector to couple off the product of dielectricity and magnetism

COMPOUNDED FIELD MOVEMENT


Hence we have the primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time
2) Space
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism
Every other relation, quantity, or expression, Volt, Amp, Ohm, etc. is
derived from these FOUR dimensions. Time and Space are the metrical
dimensions; Dielectricity and Magnetism are the physical dimensions

[picowatt]

TA,

So, your answer appears to be:

heating causes all inter-atomic dielectric coherency to be LOST as the atoms expand in picometers.

What mechanism causes the loss of "dielectric-coherency" due to an atom "expanding" as you claim?

As well, assuming then that cooling below the Curie temp allows the atoms to return to their previous "size", why does the magnet not resume its original field strength?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

As well, assuming then that cooling below the Curie temp allows the atoms to return to their previous "size", why does the magnet not resume its original field strength?

PW

How the HELL do you assume THAT insane conclusion??     


BY THAT BS premise cooling down a molten lens will allow it to return to its prior optical properties!!!!!



My god, I thought you a BIT SMARTER THAN THAT

[d3x0r]

As well, assuming then that cooling below the Curie temp allows the atoms to return to their previous "size", why does the magnet not resume its original field strength?

PW

[/size][/font]How the HELL do you assume THAT insane conclusion? ?     


BY THAT BS premise cooling down a molten lens will allow it to return to its prior optical properties!!!!!



My god, I thought you a BIT SMARTER THAN THAT

I missed the word 'not' the first scanning of that too.

[picowatt]

How the HELL do you assume THAT insane conclusion??     


BY THAT BS premise cooling down a molten lens will allow it to return to its prior optical properties!!!!!



My god, I thought you a BIT SMARTER THAN THAT

So now you believe that raising a ferrous object above its Curie temp is analogous to melting a glass lens?

A glass lens can be heated until it expands slightly, changing its refractive index a bit, but upon cooling, it will return to its previous optical qualities.  (as well, most Curie point temps are well below the substrate melting point) 

Seriously, I thought YOU were smarter than that.


Should I take your response to mean that you have no idea why "dielectric coherency" is lost above T Curie and why it does not return upon cooling?

PW