Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

As conventional science does have an explanation, I'll stick with that.

No, in fact it DOES NOT ASSHOLE.

Below you will read a DESCRIPTION..........NOT an explanation.   


"The Curie temperature is the critical point where a material's intrinsic magnetic moments change direction. Magnetic moments are permanent dipole moments within the atom which originate from electrons' angular momentum and spin. Materials have different structures of intrinsic magnetic moments that depend on temperature. At a material's Curie Temperature those intrinsic magnetic moments change direction.

Permanent magnetism is caused by the alignment of magnetic moments and induced magnetism is created when disordered magnetic moments are forced to align in an applied magnetic field. For example, the ordered magnetic moments (ferromagnetic, figure 1) change and become disordered (paramagnetic, figure 2) at the Curie Temperature."

Learn the difference  EXPLAIN  ////   DESCRIBE

My god you're dumb


DESCRIPTION:
"Higher temperatures make magnets weaker as spontaneous magnetism only occurs below the Curie Temperature"



Explain anything?  NOPE.        Moron

[93RDELEMENT]

Particle lines of force will incur damage by interference either as a thermodynamic condition or time related stress ..... The cure point can reset to a normal field position and I mean field don't let TA CONVINCE YOU THAT FIELD DONT EXISIT OR THE DAM COW WONT MAKE ANY MILK ....... OE ELECTRICTY IF THE COW IS AN ELECTRON ....... To re coil back MF AND TO ITS PERFECTED ATOMIC CONDITION THE REVERSE PATH MUST COMPLET THE SAME CYCLE AS WHEN THE MAGNET WAS MADE ..... ELECTRONS HAVE 5 QUNTIZED STATES OF CHARGE ... This is a set energy system so to reverse the dynamic one has to step back down the ladder when cooling either a lens or a magnetic or it will have lose ....... ITS CALLED ENTROPIC UNITY  FOR FORWARD AND REVERSE MAGNITIZATION .... All perfect chemical reactions can and will reverse the formula without loss !

Its nice to see that TA AS MAD AS HE IS STARTING TO INCLUDE SPACE AND TIME AND FINALY RESPECTING THE EXISITENCE OF THE ELECTRON ........... 

We now have the formula that excel orates the magnet on the surface of the lens and the complete diagram schematic for electron re-coil over a change in space time curvature !!! DO YOU HEAR THAT TA A CHANGE IN SPACE TIME CURVATURE  .......   

Regards

The best there is


   

[TheoriaApophasis]

You're insane,  go find peace.    Go smoke one or something.

[tinman]

@d3xOr and Gravox.

Why not open a thread on the HPG/HPM,and i will give my input as well. I can give you a sound explination as to how the HPG works,and why it dosnt matter if the magnets rotate with or without the conductive disk. This is using the spin field theory of TA's-seem to make sence in this case.

[TheoriaApophasis]

@d3xOr and Gravox.

Why not open a thread on the HPG/HPM,and i will give my input as well. I can give you a sound explination as to how the HPG works,and why it dosnt matter if the magnets rotate with or without the conductive disk. This is using the spin field theory of TA's-seem to make sence in this case.

I validated my INCOMMENSURABILITY THEORY tonight using a large precession (very large) ring magnet to view CENTRIPETAL LOBING RATIOS 

Proving my theory that took 4 years to complete from my discovery of 10 years ago of  1/Phi^-3


proving that Magnetism must reciprocate at PHI CUBED + 1  (5.23606).



Or, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.23606  , or  Phi^3+1        I KNEW that was the only way it could work as per my prior formula.

Time to celebrate!      PIZZA TIME!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmkqBl16Jlg