Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

You might consider opening that very closed mind of yours and actually learn something.




all radiation generates heat.   Now, go pound sand, monkey

[picowatt]

all radiation generates heat.   Now, go pound sand, monkey

So then logically, based on this statement of yours, it would seem that if a magnet does not appear to produce heat above its ambient, "magnetism" must not be a "radiation".

In your FLIR video, at 0:20 to 0:21 or so, the magnet is clearly not at a temperature different from its holding fixture, the CRT or the immediate surroundings in general (hence its barely visible outline).

Does that indicate that magnetism is not a "radiation" as you suggest?

PW

[Rfacts]

TheoriaApophasis:
   Rational thinkers know that the burden of proof is the responsibility of the person making the assertion.  Clear thinkers/true
experimentalists will objectively consider and rule out other reasonable explanations for their observations/results.  You
addressed the body heat but not the heat from the FLIR camera (active electronic device) as the possible source of the higher
temperature detected on the surface of the magnet as reasonably put forward by Picowatt.

   You don't care about public perception which you are entitled to, but there are negative consequences such as losing credibility
when you choose not to address reasonable counter arguments to your assertions.  This is compounded when you attempt to
divert attention from a valid point and/or make derogatory, contradictory or irrational remarks.

Experiments, more experiments

logic

proof

rational

? ? ?

[Acca]

 Validation of  magnetvortex AGAIN and AGAIN !!
SPINNING MAGNET ON A MAGLITE !!!

..................................next time lets put a cherry on top !!





Thanks Ken.... !!!!!

BY Acca.......................................................................................I don't care it it's wrong... It's my bloody clip !!! do your own !!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFNRp9aqeBk&list=UUwVT-3hF29an4vZOz7nGOwg

[TheoriaApophasis]

   You don't care about public perception which you are entitled to, but there are negative consequences such as losing credibility
when you choose not to address reasonable counter arguments to your assertions

Youre damn right, I do NOT give a DAMN


I retired at age 32, do what I want when I want.    IM NOT SELLING ANYTHING TO ANYONE.


I dont give a single damn ( as stated on page 1 and further) to prove anything to crusty douchebag mental midgets who dont want their sacred cow (quantum and crypto-Atomism) slaughtered.




I have NO "consequences ",  and idiot assholes that worry about "CRED" are:

1. politicians

2. morons

3. men trying to impress the opposite gender in order to get laid.



I , son, am NONE of those three.



If you want someone to kiss your ass and lie to you, go pay a hooker to tell you what a stud you are and how big your 'package' is.


I am a Platonist, ancient Prakrit, Russian, and Greek translator, and I seek approval from neither yourself nor anyone here.     Got that?


Lux et Veritas.

This is compounded when you attempt to divert attention from a valid point and/or make derogatory,

Im not IN a popularity contest son, ....that is the realm of :


1. politicians

2. Hookers / wh0res


I assume you think I am one of those two?



I appreciate genuine logic, experimentation, Platonic methods, and intelligent investigations.    Everyone else can go pound sand.