Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Continued misdirection and strawmans.  You said you had excellent debate skills.  Where are they?

You also stated an appreciation for logic, where is that lacking in my FLIR discussions?

Im still waiting for your FLIR video validation of proof of my refutation.......where is it?




On the prior:


There is NO DENOTATIVE implication of Eddy current inducing INVERSE SPIN at opposite polarities,          ONLY inverse induced eddy currents to the "moving field", which has NO QUALIFIER for polarity SPIN DIRECTION


So, your strawman "validation" has been deconstructed as hot air and bullshit.






Eddy currents (I, red) induced in a conductive metal plate (C) as it moves to right under a magnet (N). The magnetic field (B, green) is directed down through the plate. From Lenz's law the increasing field at the leading edge of the magnet (left) induces a counterclockwise current, which creates its own magnetic field (left blue arrow) directed up, which opposes the magnet's field, producing a retarding force. Similarly, at the trailing edge of the magnet (right), a clockwise current and downward counterfield is created (right blue arrow) also producing a retarding force.

[picowatt]

TA,

Are your reading comprehension skills so poor that you require a video?

PW

[Acca]

 

Consider an electrically conductive metal, a moving magnet and induced eddy currents...

So aluminum is not conductive   maybe on Mars !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJNBz-DGSzg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgIqRf6UIiY

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,

Are your reading comprehension skills so poor that you require a video?

PW

speculation and pontificative conjecture are both logomachy and non-substantive  / empirically unsubstantiated. 



Or, in short,  "put up or shut up".




"I have found great difficulty in conceiving of the existence of vortices in a medium, side by side, revolving in the same direction about
parallel axes. The contiguous portions of consecutive vortices must be moving in opposite directions; and it is difficult to understand
how the motion of one part of the medium can coexist with, and even produce, an opposite motion of a part in contact with it. In (a
mechanical) mechanism, when two wheels are intended to revolve in the same direction, a wheel is placed between them so as to be in
gear with both, and this wheel is called an 'idle wheel'. The hypothesis about the vortices which I have to suggest is that a layer of
particles, acting as idle wheels, is interposed between each vortex and the next, so that each vortex has a tendency to make the
neighboring vortices revolve in the same direction." - James Clerk Maxwell



Thats James Clerk Maxwell,  moron



or, DONT YOU READ the godfathers of electricity?  (Maxwell, Heaviside, Tesla, Steinmetz)

[picowatt]

Acca,

Who said aluminum was not conductive?  What do you think I meant by "electrically conductive metal"?

PW