Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

In another Forum, Anti-Relativity, I have already published a number of Special Relativity Paradoxes which have demolished the believability of the wrong theory Special Relativity. In specific different Threads, I have refuted SR Time Dilation, SR Length Contraction, and, SR Mass Increase.
CANGAS 84

KUDOS on your great work,  in short order this PATHETIC lie of Relativity will die quickly.   Its a demented farce.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Well, I JUST FOUND this, and am both pissed I didnt find this passage from Tesla MUCH EARLIER,


but ALSO VERY VERY HAPPY that Tesla agrees with me, that Light CANNOT BE merely a transverse EM phenomena.

Its just *#()@! impossible.


Also found a WONDERFUL new quote (new to me) from Tesla:

"Seldom if ever has an original idea of consequence been born in an elaborate laboratory. The egg of science is laid in the nest of solitude. True it may later be incubated, hatched and nursed in the million dollar laboratory. Be alone, that is the secret of invention, be alone! That is where ideas are born."- Nikola Tesla






TESLA ON LIGHT, basically the VERY SAME THING I concluded in my book, that light is ABSOLUTELY not merely transverse EM phenomena, rather has a Z-axis radial dielectric component.

He KEEPS saying light is a LONGITUDINAL disturbance, with OBVIOUS resultant transverse ATTRIBUTES.

ALL of this is the very same thing I concluded before finding this passage from Tesla, that ALL transverse components of light are merely attributes of what is a RADIAL (or Teslas longitudinal, same thing!!) Ether modality.


IN short, all the BS which conclude that LIGHT is transverse EM, is pure twaddle, it cannot be, we are taking the attributes of LIGHT, the E and M components and concluding THAT is light, but its not, its merely the attribute OF light, but NOT LIGHT ITSELF

from the book TESLA SAID:




download it here:
Library Genesis: Nikola Tesla, John T. Ratzlaff - Tesla Said

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

Your theory of light, based on ether and its features, seen and understood as something of which we are part of, not as something external to our existence, is much closer to John Worrell Keely sympathetic fields theory and work, than that of Tesla! While Tesla worked mainly in a scientific but mechanical manner, Keely went much deeper but "unscientifically" in understanding of the ether and its manifestations. And both not being foreigners to Boscovich's work. While Tesla worked with magnetism and electricity, Keely went deeper and worked right with your actual inertial dielectric plane. But of course, your theory and work, the same as of Keely etheric force or Newton's gravity and other natural forces understood and called arbitrarily by others over time, being all merely interpretation of ether manifestation, have no commercial values, so it will not be successful, than in private circles and/or only for those interested in understanding not to make money!

But don't stop, you make a great work and have all my support!

SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Sandang said: But don't stop, you make a great work and have all my support!



Sorry, I have been busy as hell working on the new edition which is far less image intensive (lol).


Increasing complexity, and drawing in the "play" of true inertia into magnetism and what role both are and plays


likewise I tie in space, acceleration, and motion (and inertia of course) into magnetism and the dielectric inertial plane which "drives" any and all magnets (and magnetism of course).



Lux et veritas.

[minnie]

  Fraunhofer researchers have come up with a 3D. imaging sensor plate that can, as it
were, visualise what's going on with magnetic fields.
    I would imagine this will be of great help in proving the magnetic vortex idea. I think
  it's capable of something like 1,000 samples per second.
                     John.