Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

So whatever electrons are they seem able to collide with phosphors and the phosphors then emit light.

Lines of dielectric induction are neither "particles"  nor "electrons"

For now we plod along with the curious idea that they are both particles and waves because that is how they have appeared to us for almost 130 years.

Speak for yourself, Im not "ploding"

Wave particle duality is a FARCE , a mental fart which gave birth to the insanity of Quantum and its string of bullshit.

There is NO "wave particle duality", only a mental defect in human critters lacking comprehension.


That light has 2 modes of reciprocation and three components is specifically the basis of the "wave-particle duality" (in reality an electromagnetic and dielectric radial-dimensional co-axial geometry) as wrongly propounded by GR and Quantum. Two transverse E and M polarizations with dimensionality and a dielectric radial component, which is the electromagnetic-fulcrum upon which electricity and magnetism conjugate thru and against.

The nonsense of "wave-particle duality" from Quantum mysticism is a fallacy; light creates interference fringes due to constructive or destructive phasing from the dielectric additive or destructive polarization, or "light on light".

While magnetism is geometric and spatial, electricity and dielectricity are counterspatial (however the electrical component is polarized). The quasi-matter of E.M. has the dielectric as the counterspatial Z-axis or ray around which electricity and magnetism reciprocate thru mutual induction and capacitance upon and rebounding against the dielectric. There are no photons, this inducto-capacitant electro-magnetic form, or E.M. accounts for the misunderstanding of wave-particle 'duality' (rather sheer ignorance) and countless other unique attributes of T.E.M.



.  The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do."



BELOW: The missing secret of light is now, for the first time ever, rationally exposed, deconstructed, and unites every phenomena known to exist around and regarding light. This explains the supposed "wave particle duality", it explains the Faraday effect, it explains the photo-electric effect, explains the manner by which light can be twisted by magnetic fields, explains why light can be deflected by extremely strong centripetal gravitational fields. The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly concluded light was a discrete wave-packet. He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'. Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectro-electromagnetic), a tri-fold circuit. The fundamental mass particle itself being a dielectric accretion formed in galactic formations, it is no coincidence whatsoever that light, like an atom itself, has dualistic properties of both waves and a beam of elements.

[MarkE]

It is true that most people have the wrong headed idea that electrons are fundamental to E/M fields.  The energy is almost all in the dielectric.  At sufficiently high frequencies there is almost no energy in the conductors.  The popular misconceptions that electrons are at the heart of E/M fields is a misconception of people who are ignorant to even classical E/M.  They get taught the concept of a battery pushing electrons through a wire to a light bulb in grammar school and that erroneous idea of electrons as balls in a hose sticks.  But that is not how either classical E/M or QED is understood at the university level.

The issue of energy quantization is a different matter.  It comes from the observations of discrete behaviors that are gated by energy levels.  That was first observed as the photoelectric effect.  Classical E/M is linear and so incapable of exhibiting amplification seen in masers and lasers.  It cannot account for the behavior of semiconductor band gaps.   So even if anyone finds QED or just QM very disatisfying, they need to find something else that can account for the very non-linear behaviors we observe in materials interacting with E/M fields.  If a mutant unicorn theory makes accurate predictions every time then it is just as good as any other theory.  But it has to predict behavior accurately.

[minnie]

   TA,
       I'm glad to hear that you're not ploding.
                         John .

[profitis]

Quote theoriapophasis:'There
are no photons, this inducto-capacitant electro-magnetic form, or
E.M. accounts for the misunderstanding of wave-particle
'duality' (rather sheer ignorance) and countless other unique
attributes of T.E.M.'

Endquote

In other words light is packets of wobbling forces.I like this idea.who came up with it?

[profitis]

Here's an Interesting fact>Did you guys know that light can exert tremendous force upon an object as if it were a pressurized gas? In a hydrogen bomb it is a burst of x-ray photons that have enough force from the fission primary to collapse the fission secondary metal mass into criticality AND squeeze the deutrium to super-high pressures at same time.this millions of psi from x-rays alone nevermind the heat!