Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on February 12, 2015, 07:21:25 AM

I see you still suffer the mental sickness that production of X is confirmation of an INVALID premise for the operation of X.


False supposition.
No, I noted that in the 50 years that we have been making semiconductors and rapidly advancing that technology each year that the QED used extensively within that industry keeps yielding correct predictions.  If QED is as fundamentally wrong as you claim then we should expect that the predictions it makes would have started diverging from observations long ago.  Now it is possible that it is analagous to Ptolemy's epicycles and that we just keep piling complexity onto it to generate the right answers.  For a better, more elegant theory to replace it, the theory has to clear the three hurdles:  1) QED must be shown to make erroneous predictions under some circumstance, 2) The improved theory must make correct predictions under the same circumstance, and 3) The improved theory must make correct predictions under all the cases that QED is known to make correct predictions.
Quote


further, you have NO idea what dielectric capacitance is.  ;D
I asked you for your definition.
Quote


Yes son, sanity PREDATED insanity (QM and GR bullshit)

thanks for the obvious.
The point is that Heavyside was unaware of the P/E effect.

profitis

Thers just one small problem.kill Quantum and you kill the whole mystery vibe of science altogether.sciencewill become boring if everything now becomes 'predictable'.let science remain art I say

profitis

Kill quantum and it might detriment science.quantum 'bullshit'ideology gives space for the human mind to 'play' ie.anythings possible.a non-quantum world will be so rigidly structured that it might fuck the human mind ie: 'but it must be like this damit,yet it isn't!' Ironicly it is because of quantum politics that many men are open to our good friend: mr overunity.this is where we thank einstein and his 'relativistic everythings a fucking illusion' imagination.einstein left a gap for overunity politics to emerge.in short,quantum uncertainty principle caters to human emotion at the same time giving space to human logic

Qwert

How does it come, that while Tesla's ability for detailed, exact description and lack of secrecy which we see in his written works, not even one describes "vortex" in magnets, while always only mentioning the principle of the rotating magnetic field as he describes his induction, alternating current, brushless, commutator-less machines?
In short: isn't strange that Tesla does not give the description of his idea of  the rotating magnetic field as the "vortex" in magnets?
Answer is simple: he means exactly what he describes when mentioning "the principle of the rotating magnetic field".

Cap-Z-ro

Quote from: Qwert on February 12, 2015, 12:49:42 PM
How does it come, that while Tesla's ability for detailed, exact description and lack of secrecy which we see in his written works, not even one describes "vortex" in magnets, while always only mentioning the principle of the rotating magnetic field as he describes his induction, alternating current, brushless, commutator-less machines?
In short: isn't strange that Tesla does not give the description of his idea of  the rotating magnetic field as the "vortex" in magnets?

Historical editing ?

Regards...