Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[MarkE]

Quote from: MarkE on Today at 03:15:04 PM

    Heavyside was unaware of the P/E effect.

you miss the point idiot.

Heaviside in his electrical papers Vol1 speaks about the power carrying pulse which is directly proportional to the frequency of the transverse E and M.


the so-called "PE EFFECT" coming later does NOT mean that the PRINCIPLE OF SAME was already known,    idiot.

There is the problem:  "proportional".  The P/E effect is not a linearly proportional effect.  It is a step-wise phenomenon.  Is the problem here that you don't understand  that the observed step-wise behavior of the P/E effect is not explicable in terms of classical E/M theory?

Quote from: MarkE on Today at 03:15:04 PM

    QED used extensively within that industry keeps yielding correct predictions.

You really are that fucking stupid apparently.

Correct electrical system predictions are and ARE BEING made based upon the bullshit that "electrons are flowing thru wires"

I CAN make 100% correct predictions about fluid dynamics based upon the premise that subatomic unicorns mediate pressure and flow.


The correct QUALIFICATION and PREDICTION of phenomena has NOT ONE FUCKING thing to do with a CORRECT EXPLANATION of said phenomena


Youre  a mental defect. 

The only way to judge that a theory is wrong is when it fails to make correct predictions.  It is fundamental to the scientific method that the way we advance theories is by disproving them and replacing them with theories that at the time withstand all efforts at disproof.

[MarkE]

Quote from: MarkE on Today at 03:03:43 PM

    That is an assertion.  I would like to see proof of the assertion.

ALL of QM and GR is an unsubstantiated ASSERTION with 0% evidence.

... diatribe snipped

If your purpose is to simply rant and rave then there can be no useful conversation.  Let me know when you are prepared to offer proof of your assertion.

[TheoriaApophasis]

If your purpose is to simply rant and rave then there can be no useful conversation.  Let me know when you are prepared to offer proof of your assertion.

If your purpose is to simply rave about bullshit that doesnt exist, ala  GR and QM, then you have nothing intelligent to say as per a conversation.



Let me know when you are prepared to qualify the assertion of GR and QM,.......ala 'curved space' and 'virtual photons'



  Let me know when you are prepared to offer ANY goddamn proof of the insane CLAIMS of GR and QM   


go find those pesky unicorns for us.

[TheoriaApophasis]

The only way to judge that a theory is wrong is when it fails to make correct predictions.

Where did you come up with that mental perversion and bullshit?   HOLY FUCKING SHIT BATMAN   



Any brain dead asshole can make CORRECT predictions based upon BULLSHIT INSANE FUCKING THEORIES/ EXPLANATIONS




The ancient (many of them) THEORIES that the gods moved the heavens and brought about the seasons, floods etc etc, followed 100% CORRECT PREDICTIONS of said phenomena.     



Honestly, you really are that goddamn stupid??? ~~!   




Scientific method, son, is about getting CORRECT, ACCURATE EXPLANATIONS.


getting quantifiable and REPRODUCIBLE experimental OUTPUTS / PREDICTIONS is LESS THAN half of said science.

[MarkE]

So that's a big no then?