Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[MileHigh]

Kenny:

A few months ago I asked you what a field was and you couldn't answer it yourself.  You tried to brush it off and you told me to go read Aristotle or something like that.

So the Foghorn Leghorn shtick with the big pointing finger "What is a FIELD?" is nothing more than theater on your part.  Don't pose the question in an accusatory way if you can't even answer it yourself.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

Kenny:

A few months ago I asked you what a field was and you couldn't answer it yourself.

nice try, prick,....I did answer same.


There is only one field, .....and 3 Field-modalities, ....transverse Circuit EM,..... the loss of inertia due to disturbance / discharge, which = magnetism.

and the UNREAL field modality, being gravity, which is just an electrostatic acceleration towards counterspace.


there are only 2 principles in the cosmos son,   Inertia and acceleration.......and Force and motion (discharge, magnetism).



A FIELD is a particle free nuemenon demarcated as or upon PHENOMENAL observations (field interactions, forces etc etc)


THE Field (not "a field") is the same thing Plato said it was.....

same thing JC Maxwell said it was.........

same thing TESLA said it was.......

same thing Heaviside said it was........

Same thing (at one point in time) the idiot Einstein said it was........


The ETHER.





You dont like the answer?  (I dont give a FUCK) 



"This medium of propagation, the Ether must exist. This medium must be a prominent thought in our investigations" Treatise on
Electricity and Magnetism – J.C. Maxwell


"There appears to be in the minds of these (supposed) eminent men, some prejudice, or a priori object against the hypothesis of a
medium (the Ether) in which the phenomena of light, electrical actions at a distance take place...the existence of a medium in which
light is propagated. But in all these theories (the insane Atomistic ones) the question naturally occurs: If something is transmitted
from one particle to another at distance, what is the condition of it after it has left one particle and before it reaches another? If this
something is the potential energy of the two particles, as in Neumann's theory, how are we to conceive of this energy existing in a
point of space, coinciding with neither one particle nor the other? In fact, whenever energy is transmitted from one body to another in
time, there MUST BE A MEDIUM OR SUBSTANCE IN WHICH THE ENERGY EXISTS after it leaves one body before it
reaches the other, for energy, as Torricelli remarked, is a 'quintessence of so subtle a nature that it cannot be contained in ANY vessel
except in the inmost substance of a thing (counterspace/ dielectricity, the Ether)'..." – J.C. Maxwell Treatise on Electricity and
Magnetism vol. II

"According to the General Theory of Relativity (pure bunk), space without Ether is unthinkable." - A. Einstein


"Ether is the cause of every magnetic field. Electricity could not exist without the Ether. Ether is the medium for all EM waves
from radio to gamma. Every particle in the universe is bathed in a sea of Ether, including the (so-called) electrons of atoms and
plasma. Ether is how particles 'know' they are moving near the speed of light in a vacuum, even if they are accelerated very slowly.
When the Ether gets cold enough, its properties change causing strange phenomena to both atoms and light. Using very cold
temperatures is a way to isolate exactly what the Ether affects; cold temperatures are to Ether physics what accelerators are to particle
physics." - N. Tesla


"When the electric current comes into being, it immediately sets the surrounding Ether into some kind of instantaneous motion, the
nature of which has still not been exactly determined. In spite of the continuation of the cause of this motion, namely the electric
current, the motion ceases, but the Ether remains in a potential state and produces a magnetic field. That the magnetic field is a
potential state [of the Ether] is shown by the [existence of a] permanent magnet, since the principle of conservation of energy excludes
the possibility of a state of motion in this case. The motion of the Ether, which is caused by an electric current, will continue until the
acting [electro-] motive forces are compensated by the equivalent passive forces which arise from the deformation caused by the
motion of the Ether itself." –("Concerning the Investigation of the State of Ether in Magnetic Fields" by Albert Einstein)



Circular illogical statements made by and thru mathematical 'science' cannot be enjoined: "field: a region of space... region: a
portion of space...space: the infinite extension of field". To employ space to define a field or field to prop up or define space or be
synonymous with space are all wrong, logically, and demonstrably. A field can never terminate in space nor is a field even part of
space itself, rather is a dimensional measure of a field or fields, of counterspace, and used contextually as an explicit reference of
influences of or by empirical objects as mediated thru or from a field. Some have, out of desperation to their materialistic
mentalities conceded defeat: "A field is an enigma, a question mark. A question cannot serve as an answer in Physics". Einstein
himself said that so far as his general relativity is concerned, "space (actually spacetime) and the gravitational field are the same
things", this type of 'thinking' is pure idiocy of the highest order.


A region is not equivalent to the thing occupying the region itself. Insanity provides that a field, the mediator, occupies space
(which it does not, counterspace cannot 'occupy space', there is no counterspace IN space!) or a field is in space, which again it is not;
space is within a polarized field or fields or rationalized between fields (rather reified) but the Ether is counterspace, and likewise
cannot be IN SPACE, rather space is within the Ether when manifest in phenomena or polarized. Einstein claims that a gravitational
field is space: "

There can be no space nor any part of space without gravitational potentials; for these confer upon space its metrical
qualities, without which it cannot be imagined at all. The existence of the gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the
existence of space." This circular conceptual reification is a logical fallacy, space has never, and never will be shown to influence
anything, nor are space and field interchangeable whatsoever. Einstein was a mental midget for this declaration. If it were, as Einstein
insanely states, that a gravitational field = space and the gravitational gradient drops as we move away from the Earth, what has
changed in the constituents of space, nothing is the answer. This is outright insanity for which the world lauds such foolishness

[joel321]

You can get the EXACT SAME pattern by shooting light at a single stick or needle,  you do NOT need slits, ......here is the video for proof of same

TA, I was playing with my laser pen today to try out the patterns of light on a 'needle' but I used a hair of my body instead.

I got patterns that are very interesting. Not just patterns that spread out in sections but also saw the patterns 'curving' as the pictures show.

I also saw vertical lines that appear from the center of the laser light.

Just thought I would share this which was very simplistic to do.

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA, I was playing with my laser pen today to try out the patterns of light on a 'needle' but I used a hair of my body instead.

NICE!


You disrupted the laser coherent (part of it) with a hair.


however PEN lasers typically have a SLIT beam, and not a DOT beam




wanna see something interesting, VERY EASY, proof of the FARADAY EFFECT

shoot a laser off the EDGE of a powerful magnet

not the TOP, not the center, but the CENTRIFUGAL EDGE OF EITHER "pole"

[joel321]

shoot a laser off the EDGE of a powerful magnet

not the TOP, not the center, but the CENTRIFUGAL EDGE OF EITHER "pole"

Not sure what you mean by that but I do have some hard drive magnets which as I understand are powerful...these is what I got from directing the laser on the edge. It's actually very very interesting to me. We have a lot of things going on there.