Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

We hereby demand apohasis re-do his proposed bismuth experiment to prove that he is not a bullshitter.

[sadang]

@TheoriaAphophasis

Great books for everyone with an open mind and with desire for comparative studies. On the web are still other books that criticize the Einstein relativity and the manner in which this theory was imposed to large masses by different interests to shape a reality in which more than 90% have to work for the others less than 10%. Maybe the same percent as the empty volume of the H atom!

I agree with your suggestions, I know you are right and you already made many ferrofluid experiences and your own ferrofluid solutions.

But taking into account the diamagnetic propriety of silver (dielectric countervoidance) I thought the best way to compensate the gravitational effect was by using silver particles with a small size (under 1 micron using this method). This small size will make them float for a long time in water and very slowly going down to the bottom of the jar. This small size of silver particle combined with the repulsion effect of their interaction with the magnetic field of the magnet, will extend the floating time. And the helical path followed by them in their long way to the bottom of the jar will make visible and very evident the intrinsic nature of the magnetic field of the magnet. That was also the reason I placed the magnet under jar and not above it. The main idea is the smaller the particles the more easy can them be involved in a dynamical path as the result of interaction with magnetic field. The main issue remain to make them observable with the naked eyes. And here a  coherent light can help to visualize them. At least this is my view of the entire phenomena.

---#---

@profitis

...every heat-sink requires a heat-rise somewhere else in the system...

The 2nd law of thermodynamic tell us about an permanent equilibrium. But I can not stop to notice this law is available only in a closed and isolate system. These systems exists only in labs or in the theoretical analysis. In nature there is no one single closed system besides the ones arbitrary chosen, defined or shaped by human minds. And these systems are seen, defined or shaped as isolate and closed systems in the reasoning paradigm of an empty space, which is a wrong premise according to my point of view.

In the meantime I see Ken already answered to you with some hints to think about.

If you say are an expert in thermodynamics, make an imaginative exercise to see its laws as they appear as seen from counterspace, or at least try their applicability in the same reasoning paradigm of an empty space, but manifesting in an open system. D you think they are still available in both cases? However, you don't need to answer me, these observations are mostly rhetorical.

Let's wait until the new laser will arrive and will see after!

[profitis]

There's nothing to preclude a 2nd law violation in an open system @sadang.infact a closed system is only possible at 0 degree kelvin so itsa just for arguments sakes to show the kids.mr apohasis claims the ball it heatup above ambient spontaneous thus a 2nd law violation.more important than that,IF he can show the magnet cooling down at same time as ball heatup then he validate his oscillatio-theoretic.he don't wana do this for unknown reason

[profitis]

Unfortunately not one of apophasis experiments can support his theoretics oscillatory.every single one of his experiments can be laid down to conventional explano. silver particle or other particle experiment does not rule out a lenz-steering as particles approach or depart magneto-field.biological experiments do not rule out lenz mhd at moment of crystallization

[sadang]

You are right. I can't say something against the Lenz law itself, it is a very evident law in the actual way of thinking, but I can't stop to observe this law use the same totally unknown magnetism and the same totally unknown electric current. Developing further an entire system appealing at an equation with two unknown terms, is not a sign of great wisdom for me. It is more a sign of great greed, that shaped a similar reality.

I knew from the beginning that I'll arrive at this point, but I assumed it. I already said in a previous message that all imaginable experiments related to magnetism will fall under Lenz, Lorenz, Faraday or other already well established laws. Only that these laws are today understood and used in an empty space shaped way of thinking, even if some of them were created having as basis the existence of ether, and the observable phenomena being merely manifestations of the ether. More than that, they are just descriptions of phenomena, not explanations. Just a way to shape the existence, a wrong one!

So back to experiments!