Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

If I asked him a question about programming.  He would come back from the dead and give me an answer that is what? 1.6 times more efficient than what I would come up with?

youre a myopic bean counting asshole. 
this isnt programming asshole, its called an "accurate generalization"   in reference to someone " who is far more accurate than most on said subject"



I know your type very well son. If you want to debate something let me know, .....Ill piss in your skull on any formal topic of discussion.

[Pirate88179]

... its called an "accurate generalization"   

Wow.  You have a good career waiting for you in the State Department.  Is this the opposite of Generalized Specifics?

Bill

[sarkeizen]

this isnt programming asshole

You said he was "more accurate" than just about everyone.  Apparently he's not more accurate than I am about algorithm design.  Too bad.  I would love to have talked combinatorics with zombie Russell.

its called an "accurate generalization"   in reference to someone " who is far more accurate than most on said subject"

Oh so you get to pick a very small subset of extant fields where Russell was "far more accurate".  No doubt you also get to pick the scale and metric for accuracy.  Which sort of makes my point for me but don't worry if you don't get it.

If you want to debate something let me know, .....Ill piss in your skull on any formal topic of discussion.

Yawn.  The second you say something formal enough to be debated I'll let you know.  Until then you can return to your needlessly enormous diagrams...which aren't compensating for anything at all....

[joel321]

TA, those pictures are very interesting but hard to see. I think there is a code to resize them. I'm looking at the forum in a 1080p monitor and the pictures fill my entire screen, it throws off the viewing experience. 

[TheoriaApophasis]

Wow.  You have a good career waiting for you in the State Department.  Is this the opposite of Generalized Specifics?

Myopic crotch cricket.   


A "accurate generalization"   is PLATONIC RETRODUCTION.



an "accurate generalization"  is that one doesnt "go looking for fish in the Nevada desert



One works from the KNOWN to the SPECIFIC as most expedient problem solving.   Not the inverse, like idiots as yourself do.



I wasnt chess champ in high school and college and graduated 2 years early by being a DUMBASS like yourself, son.