Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

joel321

If a vortex does not exist, how do you know is does not?

By the same token,

If it does exist, how do you know it exists?

Now those that don't know jack shit just get eliminated one by one.

Let the competitions begin. lol

By the end of the day, or sub forum, we will know who is right 100% and who is wrong 100%.

The winner will win a medal made of 24 karat gold.

profitis


profitis


sarkeizen

Quote from: sadang on March 04, 2015, 01:00:45 AM
Just a matter of interpretation and education! For the record!
Same could be said for the Koran as a book of science or the Bible or the writings of Bahá'u'lláh.   The point is when you write text that is so ridiculously vague you can almost certainly find parallels or predictions in real science.  As long as what you are reading is sufficiently large and the distribution of words is sufficiently broad and your interpretation doesn't require any rigor then the likelihood that you are imputing your evidence is much much higher than the idea that you are actually being taught anything. :)

sadang

QuoteThe point is when you write text that is so ridiculously vague you can almost certainly find parallels or predictions in real science.
Why not viceversa? Just another example which confirm is just a matter of interpretation and education.