Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Qwert

Quote from: sadang on March 09, 2015, 12:44:29 AMSomeone who search alternatives because he noticed the errors existing everywhere in the current science, and had the courage to doubt about the thinking of its founders, or someone who blindly and obediently follow a well circulated path by others before him?

This forum is full, if not most of guys who fall under above description. And all those guys seem being lunatics or at best they look ridiculous if their testing methods are incomplete and/or not adequate. And in this case any attempt of a discussion is ineffective. Is there possible a discussion if the one who has the courage, is absolutely sure that ONLY he is right and everything else is wrong? A person who does not mean to discuss his work(s) should not enter forums; a forum is a site for discussion.

PS
@sadang,
If you want to remain friendly relations to TA, you should not cite theoretical science guys, including Quantum Mechanics guys.

sarkeizen

Quote from: sadang on March 09, 2015, 10:44:06 AM
This question is at least ridiculous, or it denote something more serious. You already emphasized the answer in your first quotes, and if you don't have the ability to sense which are the errors, I'm no longer surprised to see your behavior and way of thinking.
In other words you don't know.  You know can just say that right?  When you get around to spending time with really intelligent folk you'll realize that quite a number of them, don't care about not knowing something. 

So next time instead of trying to avoid the question or denigrate someone for asking - all seem to be pretty plainly about keeping yourself from feeling ignorant - you'll just say "I don't know".

sadang

@Qwert

No, this is just your own malicious interpretation of their behavior, when you make them lunatics. Each one is here on this forum to search answers according to their level of understanding. You are not smarter than other, only believe you are. Each individual has something to say, and form each is something to learn. And as history already shown us, the real discoveries are made exactly by people that don't obey the scientific mainstream rules.

But when someone is from the beginning ridiculed, soiled, smeared in all forms by various individuals through their own arrogance and limited views, how could a mere man react? According to his own temperament, leaves forum or reply to challenges with the same currency. Who benefits from this? Nobody!

And to not forget this is a forum about overunity, a place where until now and according to my knowledge no one have a monopoly. And also this is a topic about magnetic vortex, not about the current orthodox magnetism. That's the topic which should be discussed and practice here. And I emphasize, discusses and practice about vortex magnetism.

PS
If I'd used quotes from Wilhelm Reich or T.J.J. See or other unaccepted scientist which would have been your innocent comment? Read the autobiographic work of Max Plank first and after that maybe will understand my "friendly relation with TA".

---

@ sarkeizen

I gave you all info required to make your homework. Why do you think I made that quote from Max Plank, just for funny? No, it was just a polite invitation to study his own words about the errors existent in the world of quantum mechanics. Now, you thought my intention was to denigrate you, but this is your own wrong interpretation. My intent was to make you think and go study for yourself what he said and wanted to say. My intent was to invite you to not believe what I shown you, but instead to make your own homework, and draw your own conclusions. Now, waiting on me to expose aspects that became easy accessible are not beneficial to you or me.

The game of consecutive asking is just a child game, and do not denote too much intelligence. Pay attention next time: All questions have to be rhetorical! A totally different meaning for the current way of asking, involving personal study not waiting subjective responses. I'm sick of "who is smarter" game and contradictory discussions, when they should be only complementary!

profitis

Sadang:'The game of consecutive asking is just a child game, and do not
denote too much intelligence.'

Apophasis will get a childish response to a childish game.


Sadang:'  I'm sick of "who is smarter" game and
contradictory discussions, when they should be only
complentary!'

How can we be complimentary to someone who lays down the new law then withdraws his reasoning? This thread is descending into a psychological madness that not even carl jung could hope to interpretate

sarkeizen

Quote from: sadang on March 09, 2015, 01:16:28 PM
I gave you all info required to make your homework.
In other words - you don't know.  It's interesting how often this dodge comes up here.  Why is it so hard for you to admit? There's a story about Feynman participating in an interdisciplinary conference they had a court reporter writing down what the various experts said.  At some point after a panel discussion the reporter asks him what he does for a living.  He says: "I'm a professor of physics, science" and the reporter replies "Oh that explains it.  Every time one of those other guys talks I have no idea what they are saying.  Every time you speak I know exactly what you are saying."

See, when you want to pretend that there's some great mystery or that people have to do a bunch of work - just so you can answer a rather fundamental framing question - then you are really telling people "I have no idea what I'm talking about" or "I understand this subject very, very, very, very poorly".  If you were asking a clear, unambiguous question about my field.  I'd have no trouble answering you clearly.  Why? Because I know my shit and you don't.

So please stop dodging the question.  What errors in current physical theory are you personally talking about here?