Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Qwert]

But when someone is from the beginning ridiculed, soiled, smeared in all forms by various individuals through their own arrogance and limited views, how could a mere man react? According to his own temperament, leaves forum or reply to challenges with the same currency. Who benefits from this? Nobody!

@sadang,
Are you drunk, or only sick, sadang? Have you seen/read this guy's so-called book "Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism"? There you'll find the author's examples how to effectively ridicule others. And whom he ridicules there? Such one like him, "the one with courage" of different thinking.

[synchro1]

And how full is this pit, and how many jab the wood in its fire?

From the father of quantum theory:
"Instead, we have not only linked at the very outset the concept of causality to the human intellect, specifically to the ability of man to predict an occurrence; but we have been able to carry through the deterministic viewpoint only with the expedient of replacing the directly given sense world by the world picture of physics, that is, by a provisional and alterable creation of the human power of imagination."

On this base of reasoning, specific to founders and further to developers of current science or at least a great part of it, was shaped the current reality from each we are part of, and which we continue to shape accordingly. I dare to ask now; who is more lunatic synchro1? Someone who search alternatives because he noticed the errors existing everywhere in the current science, and had the courage to doubt about the thinking of its founders, or someone who blindly and obediently follow a well circulated path by others before him?

Anyone who maintains that numbers have religious significance is "Barmy". Like the Pythagorean theorem is the "Holy Trinity" etc! Projecting spiritual meaning onto pure mathematical abstractions amounts to the rantings of an unsound mind! Couple that with persistent, acerbic, condescending abuse, and it's time to drop the net.

[TheoriaApophasis]

As I said, the father of quantum physics,

the ENTIRE premise of quantum and Einsteins pubic-hair ponderings are that that "mother nature" is an INSANE CRACK WH0RE


its just that simple. 



Tesla didnt "buy" it

O. Heaviside didnt "buy" it

Eric Dollard doesnt "buy" it

and i sure the FUCK dont buy it.   

[sarkeizen]

Just going through this thread because I'm bored...

Thats a bandwaggon fallacy.

Not really.

  A bandwaggon fallacy - argumentum ad populum - is an appeal to an idea being popular among ordinary people is in and of itself indicative of it's truth.  Asking for a modern reference doesn't necessitate that.

Advice I give lots of armchair logicians like yourself.

i) You should always be able to show your work.  If all you can do is label something a "argumentum ad verecundiam" but can't break the contested statement down into a syllogism showing it.  Then you probably have a pretty weak case.
ii) Fallacies are not rebuttals or disproofs.  Many popular things are true, many new things are better than old things and many states have sequelae .  So a fallacious argument means the argument is invalid not that something is untrue.
iii) Fallacies often have assumptions behind them it isn't unreasonable to expect, in some circumstances for popular assertions to usually or always to be true.
iv) Fallacies often apply more weakly to probabilistic arguments than formal arguments.  So while absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.   Absence of evidence can and does imply a lower LIKELIHOOD of being correct. 
v) Ordinary speech doesn't always differentiate between "mostly" and "always and forever" very well.  So iv) applies more often than you think.

[TheoriaApophasis]

@sadang,
Are you drunk, or only sick, sadang? Have you seen/read this guy's so-called book "Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism"? There you'll find the author's examples how to effectively ridicule others. And whom he ridicules there? Such one like him, "the one with courage" of different thinking.

those that TALK, and those that DO

As for the book, it only ridicules the insanity of Einstein and of GR and QM


However AS PER said ridicule in said work, it comprises LESS than 2% of the entire book.


Ergo, your premise is pure bullshit that its a "book of ridicule" 



The Greeks said "the fool cuts himself with his own tongue"

I forward that warped space bullshit and the INSANITY of GR and QM came first,  ala  SELF-ridicule.


wise up, son.


"Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality."
– W. Russell


"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract
(unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense."
------Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum


Quantum insanity: "Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real." – N. Bohr


Quantum insanity: "The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how
the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman





ALL OF QUANTUM is built upon "VIRTUAL PARTICLES"............and what do they say these  (bullshit)  "Virtual particles" ARE??

"A virtual particle is an abstraction, which facilitates in calculations and understanding, the
term is very vague and loosely defined, they never appear as inputs or outputs of experiments, their existence is questionable at
best,...however they are very useful in rendering concepts and making equations balance out"



IF you DONT think that is 100% FUCKING INSANE,  then you need to check yourself into a clinic.