Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

Even in talking with Timm via phone, he agrees electrons are NOT particles or beads etc etc.

BUT, any theory presented regarding the "true" nature of what everything is and how it works, must also explain why all the currently accepted models and related math work so well.  It has to explain why there are areas of "space" that at least "act as" or "manifest as" electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, etc. (the whole list of particles actually).  Science has learned to  manipulate, probe, image, quantify, predict, and design technology with, the current models to such precision that it is doubtful that they can be all that inaccurate.

The science of chemistry works quite well with the present day models using the concept of electrons and their defined orbitals.  Certainly no one can deny the advances made in the field of electronics.  As for atomic, nuclear, or particle physics, the use of the technology created with the present day models has allowed science to probe deeper into that realm of the "particles" producing imagery that continues to support that there are at least regions of "space" that do indeed manifest as particles, atoms, molecules, etc. 

Any new theories of what everything is, will also have to agree with or obey the present day mathematical modeling derived from experimentation and observation, improve on its accuracy, or, at the very least, explain why the present day models and math only "appear" to work so well.  The use of QM and QED, for example, has allowed science and technology to advance at an even faster rate than was possible prior to their use, so again, as it appears to work so very well, any new theory must agree with or, at the least, explain why QM and QED, if they are wrong, work as well as they do having permitted the advances made and the predictions confirmed.

It is no great leap to believe that there are no particles, as in some little solid ball with a real "physicality", but it is indeed a great leap to believe that there are no regions of "something" we call "space" so defined or modulated to at least manifest as something that presents the appearance and qualities of that which we refer to as a "particle".

Unlike some, I believe science is progressing nicely.  100 years is not a long time.  Look at where science was just that short time ago.  The past 100 years has brought about technological advances building upon and using that which was discovered in the prior centuries.  Using those technological advances, science is probing deeper into both the very small and the very distant, using tools not even conceivable 100 years prior.  I believe science will, in the next 100 years, provide another incredible leap in our understanding of what "it" is all about.

Provided, of course, that humanity also advances, learning to be considerate of each other and their surroundings.  Advances in technology without similar advances in humanity is likely just a recipe for disaster.     

[profitis]

Picowatt:'regions of "space" that do indeed manifest as particles, atoms, molecules, etc.'

I would like to know IF or HOW photons or matter can appear out the blue from absolutely nothing ie vaccuum space or vise versa and 'disappear'.this is something I'd love to discuss over coffe with a qm one fine day.the idea that the universe's matter is and always was just 'there' is always troubling me.I've got my own theory that 'vaccuum' or 'nothingness' is infact a single giant photon of humungous wavelength that spits out pieces smaller photons and absorbs them back in.I'm thinking true 'nothingness' 'exists'(this is the wrong word for this but the only word available) only outside of empty vaccuum and cannot possibly be perceived.all we see is mirage or space-time curvature of this gargantuan photon or some shit like that

[TheoriaApophasis]

must also explain why all the currently accepted models and related math work so well. 

i explained this PAGES ago you idiot.
ACCURATE experimental duplications and empirical observation DONT HAVE ANY FUCKING GODDAMN CONNECTION TO ACCURATE EXPLANATIONS.
Honest and true, you really ARE that goddamn dumb

I can work out correct math for the orbital vectors of a spaceship and explain same with subatomic graviton Unicorn particles


the first half of that (DESCRIPTION, REPRODUCIBLE OBSERVATION)  is correct


the second half (the EXPLANATION) is 100% wrong

Wise the Ever-Loving-Goddamn-Hell  UP

It has to explain why there are areas of "space" that at least "act as" or "manifest as" electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks

No such BULLSHIT has ever OCCURRED,........ EVER


Space is nothing, neither FORCE nor FIELD, NOR can MANIFEST ANYTHING of its own accord.



Like saying NOTHING, a dark room "manifested a dude that stuck his head out into the light"

ie, an EMPTY ROOM "manifested some guy"


No dufus, something was manifest from inertia, ie COUNTERSPACE  that appeared in some COORDINATE of space



Space has NEVER EVER produced ANYTHING  . EVER 

[picowatt]

And then there is that...

[profitis]

Apophasis:'Space is nothing, neither FORCE nor FIELD, NOR can MANIFEST ANYTHING of its own accord.'

Crap man.where did the universe originate from then huh? Empty Space is not what it appears to be.it is relativistic.so is matter.they fold on each other