Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TinselKoala]

So, let's continue developing a bit the most important element, namely dielectricity. It is defined in Ken's book as follow:
- dielectricity is the fundamental Ether-modality of the entire cosmos
- dielectricity is the Ether under torsion and torque at its inertial plane
- dielectricity is counterspace
- dielectricity is the Ether boundary, the inertial plane, and the membrane at which only another conjugate polarized field can torque to create other phenomena
- dielectricity is counterspatial, is centripetal, is inertial and does not act on (most) other phenomena
- dielectricity is the conjugate of magnetism
- dielectricity is a versor in counterspace
- dielectricity is greater inverse to the space
- dielectricity is counterspatial, inertial, radial, and centripetal
- dielectricity is electropositive
- dielectricity is necessitatively divergent in discharge in an expanding circulatory fashion
- dielectricity is to gravitation as electricity is to magnetism
- dielectricity is the point causation for the creation of mass/gravity
- dielectricity is a superluminal radial and counterspatial inertial plane in the inter-atomic

---#---
More details for ordinary people in the book called "Uncovering the missing Secret of Magnetism", for studious skeptics in the scientific literature prior relativity, and for dogmatic skeptics there are no more details.

"Dielectricity", as used in these "definitions",  is so much word salad. Take any one of those statements and break it down into its component parts -- they are all nonsense. Take any of those statements and use them to derive a mathematical relationship among measurable variables and then construct an experiment to demonstrate the accuracy of that derived relationship.... you cannot, because they are all just meaningless word salad. The statements are even contradictory in themselves.

Dielectricity is counterspace.
But Dielectricity is a "versor".
But Dielectricity is a membrane.
But Dielectricity is a point.
But Dielectricity is radial.
But Dielectricity is a causation.
But Dielectricity is the Ether under torsion.
But Dielectricity is centripetal... but divergent.
Etc etc.

"Dielectricity" as the term is used above is a bunch of self-contradictory nonsense, demonstrated in the statements above.

[profitis]

 my thoughts too mr tinselkoala.these guys are not giving us any tools to compehend or work with or make sense of what they are saying.how can one make progress like this.exactly ZERO evidence that a magnetic field is any different to the classic static field model.when I say zero I mean fuck-all,zip.zilch.nada

[sadang]

@TinselKoala

Thanks for the effort to clarify things up! For me this salad has the desired taste. Perhaps you forget the salt! Or perhaps your taste buds have atrophied or worn out from too many abstract ingredients and forgot the taste of salt! Try again but begin with salt in small doses. Good luck!

[profitis]

Sadang says:'blah-de-blah'

I say:'show me the fucking evi-dence rodriguez'

[minnie]

    Well now I know what dielectricity is. Kenny doesn't think there are electrons so how
does he get round a relatively simple experiment such as Millicans oil drop experiment
which not only establishes the charge of the non existent electron but also it's mass?
              John.