Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

Joel:'He asked me to '

I ordered you

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:' list of steps'

Let's make it easier for you: E equilibrium= gOE(a)-gOE(b) where gOE is the gaseous galvanic overpotential on the two inert electrodes (a) and (b).since gaseous overpotentials are intrinsic to the elemental work functions of different elements we can insert constants and it becomes Ek= k(a)-k(b) at 25 deg C. I win. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v159/n4042/abs/159539b0.html

[sadang]

Raz, to comprehend the intimate aspects of Universe someone don't have to follow others ways, just to ask himself consecutive questions. All answers are all around him, just matter how he look at them. If he look at them as to separate things of himself, all interpretation and further shaping of the Universe will be in an irresponsible way. On the contrary, if he look at them as him being part of the Universe, then the further shaping of this will be a responsible one. The same was the case for Russell! And for others of course! Now again, here Ken can give a hand of help, only to want. He know much more than me about Russell.

I associate the dielectricity with what is known in science as electrostatics. Of course it is just a convenience, the current scientific electrostatics concept as equivalent of some dualistic, separate and independent static electricity is a very wrong assumption. Is the same as saying the breathing is composed only of inspiration or just expiration, which could exists independent of each other. Both, the dielectricity and the breathing are ever dynamic processes, dualistic (or opposed) as interpreted by human minds, but as a whole (a necessary complementarity) seen in their intimate nature and way of manifestation.

Now you asked me how it can be used in practical experiments. Exactly as usual electrostatics experiments are performed by someone interested in this matter. Just the premises of each experiment with electrostatics will shape the expected results. Now, in an empty space thinking paradigm, the electrostatic concept will give rise to well known kind of experiments. But in an all pervading ether thinking paradigm other are the premises and other the results expected and achieved (for this reason it is said the truth is front of all, but no one see it). Where someone is blocked at Lenz Law and can't see more than what that Law impose, others will see the interaction of helical dynamics of ether modalities in their way back to the inertial plane. And the most important aspect in this new thinking paradigm and not only for this kind of experiments, is that the observer is part of the experimental setup. In fact how the things usually happen all the times from the beginning, only we don't want to accept this fact or we are conditioned to not even sense it, resuming our kind of lab and life experiments only to mechanical premises and mechanical expected results. Is a closed loop of manifestations from each the observer is wrongly excluded. For this reason all freaky, unusual experiments phenomena are officially rejected by academic science and oculted to the knowledge of large masses, but studied intensively in private or governmental areas.

Now, hope you get an image of how I think about the dielectricity, but please don't ask me to put in plain words all my thoughts. Let's follow the way of Ken and to make experiments according to what and how we understand things and expose them, leaving to others the right, pleasure or hate to interpret them according to their own level of understanding and knowledge.

[Raz]

Sadang: Thanks for your thoughs. Dont worry, I wont torture you too much. I was envisioning the dielectric in static electricity too, as I have seen this this set up in numerous experiments . Just good to know others consider it too.

[sarkeizen]

Let's make it easier for you

Not a list of steps.  Keep on being the big loser you are it makes me all happy inside.

Need a hint? Example:

i) Assuming Socrates is a man and all men are mortal.
ii) Socrates is moral.

It is impossible if i) is true that ii) is not true.  We went through this and all you could do is claim that some argument existed but you didn't want to write it down but if you've changed your mind then by all means please write it out.

...but we all know you can't because you're a moron.