Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Another very interested topic

the very last missing 'link' of magnetism has now (I got it) finally been solved.


equalized magnetic Gauss flux density and dissimilar phase shifts has finally been solved.


I got it, and Ive got the formula for it, and I have the simplex explanation for it, and the very very last "key" has been clarified and solved.




Time to celebrate 

[TheoriaApophasis]

   JJ. Thomson- Nobel prize-Identify electron as a particle.

NOPE.........JJ Thompson denied for a very very VERY long time the BS notion that his discovery was a "particle"

he was convinced he would get a nobel prize and FAME if he acknowledged it was


he did.......


so thats the REAL STORY there

   K. Wheeler-Nobel prize-dismiss electron?
   Was Einstein an idiot?

Yes, Einstein was a GD IDIOT from hell


I dont have to dismiss the electron, it doesnt exist.

[Dynamic Vortex]

Ive finally proven and have the math proof for WHY Gauss readings are equal on each "pole", but the transverse (light etc) phase shift effect of phenomena coincident to either pole is DIFFERENT.



The absolute last key of magnetism, Ive finally got it fully solved.  ( i had it solved, but didnt have the complete answer).


So simplex.


At last, ...........every aspect and every attribute has been sealed up. 

I would like to see the mathematical proofs. Specially what is your explanation to the opposite magnetic vortices. Could you post something?

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

I'm glad to see you are unstoppable! That's the way when really try to find or understand something. The all pervading ether and its modalities of manifestations are the future not the current scientific empty space filled with everything the human mind can conceive!

...equalized magnetic Gauss flux density and dissimilar phase shifts has finally been solved...

Removing the concept of "Space, the final frontier!" as an empty entity and transforming it in an attribute of field is not so easy to be swallowed by human mind. It is a complete return upside down of all current human concepts.

Just keep go on!

---#---

Hi Dynamic Voryex,

Any new and most complete  theory have to prove the correctness of results obtained by the previous one. So, at first the language must be the same.

That's the sure way to waste your current existence going on a well known road instead of trying something completely new! Dare more than that!

The displacement current emphasize very clear that something is wrong in the current electromagnetic theory, and prove it is only a way from others infinite ways to conceive and shape the reality. It is just an another patch added to the sack, in fact it being patched everywhere.

SaDAng

[Dynamic Vortex]

---#---

Hi Dynamic Voryex,
That's the sure way to waste your current existence going on a well known road instead of trying something completely new! Dare more than that!

The displacement current emphasize very clear that something is wrong in the current electromagnetic theory, and prove it is only a way from others infinite ways to conceive and shape the reality. It is just an another patch added to the sack, in fact it being patched everywhere.

SaDAng

Thanks for your kind repply.

The Maxwell Electromagnetic theory has more than 100 years of tecnological succsess. All electronic device is based in these equations. So its impossible to start anything new without referring to current theory. Understanding is facitated using a commom an objective language. Mathematics is that language.

What Ken calls Dielectricity is exactly the Displacement present in Maxwell Theory. Nothing new. The Displacement Current is the first derivative of Displacement. The total current is the electronic J + dD/DT (Displacement current).
The Displacement current existence was proved in vacumm capacitors, where a magnetic field was measured.
So its only a language issue.
The word Dieletric is used to describe a property of 2 diferents mediums, material (molecules and atoms) and vacuum (immaterial  or etheric). In material we find eletrical charges, in vacuum we cannot measured none.
Hence, Dieletric is not the best word to use because the process is different in each one.