Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,

I'm glad to see you are unstoppable! That's the way when really try to find or understand something
SaDAng

Ive got a lot to lay out in this next edition, including making the reciprocating precessional hyperboloid which extrapolates the hypotrochoidal pattern seen.............making THIS<< so so so so divinely simple for others to picture in their mind, and that it cannot exist any other way....etc.


This seemingly complex magneto-spatial geometry (and its not actually spatial, but thats for later discussion) is so divinely simplex its beyond stunning.


this explains polaric phase shift,

this explains gyromagnetic precession

this explains the extremely simplex hypotrochoidal formation




There is a SOON DAWN when humanity will no longer see  Gravity vs Magnetism vs Electricity vs Electrostatics......


this is all but one thing ONLY with one attribute (magnetism) and two hybrid modalities (electricity and so-called 'gravity')



Again, mother nature is not a crazy crack wh0re , the Universe is so so so much more simple than anyone could wish or dream for.


It even blows my damn mind. 

[Dynamic Vortex]

Hi Dynamic Vortex,

Thank's you paid attention to my message.

Who said that? Who believe this? If all unofficial inventors and scientist would have thought so, nothing would be discovered. Everything can be questioned, especially the bricks of a great theory!

The Newton gravity law has more then 300 years and you can say exactly the same thing as for Maxwell's electromagnetic theory. Just that both are valid and consistent with the current scientific paradigm. Just a way of expression of human will and to shape a specific reality from other infinite others! Specific premises, specific development, specific results! Replace "specific" with "wrong" and the sentence will become more real.

I would like to see an example of this, because I know that no one measured ever a magnetic field from a displacement current.

What's the difference between material an immaterial, when 99 x 10-14 in an atom is empty space? And going further, what is a charge if electron doesn't exists? At least not as a particle!

Many questions to which can not be answered following the current thinking paradigm. Or can be answered only in an evasive way!

SaDAng

Hi Sadang.

Lets start from beginning.
As I said before is a language issue. Right meanings are fundamental.
We do have working theories that are producing right results.
Yes Newton was right! He did not explained What gravity is. He described How it works in macroscopic phenomena.
Airplanes, rockets, satelites, etc, do work and are made with his equations. NASA uses his equations. So it is not wrong, it is practical.
Besides he invented calculus. One of the most important achievements ever made by a human being. His work benefits all humanity. So we must be humble. He was a genius.
And yes, the Displacement current was validated by experiment! What do you think? That Maxwell "invented" and put something is his theory when nobody was looking? He have to prove! Do some research and you will find.
Maxwell Electromagnetic theory waited for 30 years until the Electromagnetic wave was discovered by Hertz!
It is very arrogant to say now: these guys are mental midgets!
Every day some smart crank go to internet claiming a new revolucionary theory that explains everything! Everybody is wrong, he is right! So, he have to prove.
Start showing What is wrong and why. What is missing. Also be humble to ask: Am I wrong?
I can accept a new discovery, but I am waiting for the logical explanations.

No, there is a huge diference between interatomic and/or intermolecular space and empty space! Fields!

TheoriaApophasis claims a new discovery. I can accept that "a priori".
There are problems in his explanations.
Words like " reciprocation" and  incommensurability explains nothing!

There is no way that a contracting vortex becomes an expanding vortex or the contrary.
Where is the current that is associated with the contracting vortex?
Why this vortex spins at opposite direction?
These are logical questions demanding logical answers.

[sadang]

Hi Ken,

I'm afraif the DAWN you speak about will not appear too soon! But I'm conviced it will appear when people will be ready! Right now people have enough imposed mental blocks, to even seize and further to overcome them through their own effort.

But let's hope... because all oceans are made by drops!

Don't hurry with the next edition of the theory, just make it as accessible as it can be to all minds.

---#---

Hi Dynamic Vortex,

There is no any beginning to start from. There is a beginning only if I agree with your so called beginning. Can you agree with and comprehend this aspect? Also, if there is the case, can you expand this agreement with all people around you? If not, then everything is a waste of energy!

And there is not a language issue! There is a thinking issue! Behind any language there is a specific way of thinking! There is the problem, not at the language level, because the meanings (as you say) are fundamental.

Yes, Newton made all you said, and due to its laws we have the current society. But this should stop me to question his law of gravity? Or to try to find its cause, instead of just to use its effect? 

Regarded the Maxwell and his electromagnetic theory, show me or indicate a single experiment that proved the existence of displacement current! A practical experiment, not a theoretical one! I'm really curious to read and understand it, it's premises, results and conclusions!

Ken claims what he understand and how he understand things, you don't have to agree with him 100%. No body forces you to do that! But, as long as you paid attention to his theory, it means you already have some doubts about the bricks of the current scientific paradigm.

[Dynamic Vortex]

Regarded the Maxwell and his electromagnetic theory, show me or indicate a single experiment that proved the existence of displacement current! A practical experiment, not a theoretical one! I'm really curious to read and understand it, it's premises, results and conclusions!

Ken claims what he understand and how he understand things, you don't have to agree with him 100%. No body forces you to do that! But, as long as you paid attention to his theory, it means you already have some doubts about the bricks of the current scientific paradigm.

Hi Sadang.

One single experiment? OK this is one:http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.59

I suggest google, even  wikipedia and reading Maxwell  "On Physical Lines of Force".

What people are not understanding is the impact of Ken's claims. If a single part, specially the 2 magnetic vortices is true, then it will be one of the most important discovery of this century.
I take this very seriously accepting some of  his claims a priori, but I will not give up the necesary subsequent logical analysis.
The question involved with the 2 magnetic fields and the dielectric plane is related to Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl work and his new formulation of Maxwell's wave equation.
All these is related with Ether structure, specially Dr. Anatoly Rykov hypothesis.
So you can see that I am not kidding.

I started reading this forum from beginning.
MileHigh exposed a technical problem and he was violently attacked. Nobody listen.
He was right.

I did the analysis and found that the television experiment was wrong.
My observation was posted in YouTube at Video3 and video8 of Ken's videos.

Ken have 9 other different experiments.
At least one more I suspect is invalid too.
But his discovery was not invalidated as I said in the post.

The main difficult is the lack of mathematical treatment. Ken's language is hermetic.

It's not a blue or red pill choice. It's not take it or leave it.

We are here to help.

[Dynamic Vortex]

Theoria,

I looked at your fist clip and the beginning of the second clip that you linked to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dilk8gcDxac

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwn3CqvRumg

All that your two clips do is confirm that the current theory for how magnetic fields work is correct.

So sorry, but your two clips show the "opposite" of what you are stating in your proposition.  Your clips with the magnet and the CRT TV confirm that there is no "magnetic vortex."

MileHigh

Hi MileHigh.

Yes this experiment is not valid and do not support the conclusions.
I did the analysis and posted in Ken's video 3.

The magnetic field is a mathematical vortex. It has flux density and is spinning in the way Maxwell postulates on his theory. This was fundamented in Faraday's experiments.

The correct way to know is to map tridemensionally the magnetic lines of force as Maxwell said.

Personal offences are not a good way to start a conversation.

Ken had a lot of work, so let's take some benefit and give him credit.