Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Acca]

Here is a clip that was just put up on the 14 of December for Atom..

The video is from Dennis Lee the energy guru from the 1980's who was in prison for two years by making the most efficient

heat pump...                 and now I will show you that magnets do have energy by his video..

Yeas he was destroyed by the oil and power guys.. and crushed to a nothing of a man..

The bastards wanted him dead...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJy_7AuMwEQ
 


Acca..

and p.s thanks for the clarification of the magnetic rainbow !!!
[/font]

[sm0ky2]

im always amazed when a ridiculous thread gets to be hundreds of pages long....

what exactly is it we are trying to "prove" by claiming that a magnetic vortex exists, or can exist?
by nature of magnetism, any magnetic field, when observed from a perspective outside the field, takes on the shape of a Torus.
Now, by torus, is do not definitively mean a particular symmetry. A field may vary in shape or intensity depending on its source.
But, by definition, the energy flow of the magnetism flows as a torus, through its' center.
There are also complex magnetic tori with multiple axis
if the source of the field is subject to relative motion to the observer, or its internal components
   in certain conditions, a magnetic "vortex" could be created.
   We can do the same thing with water.....  [Flush]

For example, take a ring magnet from a microwave::

    embed it into a piece of Styrofoam sufficient enough to float the magnet.
place it upon water, and spin it.
Now, from our perspective, we observe a magnetic vortex traveling in two dimensions, on a single plane
we observe a vortex because the axis of rotation is traveling through space relative to us, the observer.

now, if we fix this magnet in one place, and simply rotate it on that same plane
  we find no observable vortex, nor much change in flux at all. almost exactly as if the field were not spinning.
this is because there is no relative motion between the observer and the axis of rotation.
  However, look closer, and we find that within the core of the magnet (where the hole is) there is an opposing field domain
that separates not one, but two magnetic torus in an asymmetrical manner. and the domain between these two forms a vortex.
magnetic material placed in this area will spin around and through like you flushed it down the toilet.

So, now let us keep the magnet stationary.
  the observable vortex has now diminished completely.
the ring magnet cannot be used for closer analysis because we need a more defined axis of magnetism.
so now lets take a cylindrical magnet is similar strength
here we find that, while at the atomic level, each atom or group of atoms does indeed spin and create a microscopic vortex,
the cumulative result of these vortexes is not observable at a macro scale because they are not synchronous.
each atom is spinning to the tune of its own fiddle. the spins are aligned, which creates a macro scale magnetic moment
but the observable frequency is slightly variant, is only represents the combined radiation of many different spins.

So, how can we make it vortex?
lets look at some of the very rare earth magnets with intensities great enough to
synchronize the average spin of the atoms.
now we have relative motion of the axis from our perspective, and can observe particles spinning at either end of the cylinder magnet.
[Flush]

This is a quality of the magnetic field emanating from physical material, but what about the field itself?
we can create a torus field, like the top of a tesla coil, and if pulsed at a frequency, will create a vortex.
but if we pass through a constant voltage, it will create a stationary field.
  here again, we have no relative motion between observer and axis of rotation.
The motion of the field is purely toroidal from our perspective, without rotation.
(a small magnetic gradient can be observed from + to - of the electrical circuit, this can be countered by application of electronic stabilizing equipment)
If we then spin this electrically created magnetic field, much like the spinning magnet, we observe no change in flux
nor any vortex.
unless we allow the spinning field to travel on one or more dimensions, relative to our perspective.

So, how do we change our perspective?

Let's take this torus coil and shrink it down to a very small size, and increase the energy exponentially
such that the field intensity is great enough to overpower not only its surroundings, but the very atomic material of the air inside it.
Now the field domains are interlocked, much like the very strong rare earth magnet.
if we spin this field, now we once again observe the vortex.
[Flush]

We don't need a toilet, we can make vortexes with air too, I think Tesla had a turbine that did this to create spin using compressed air, very efficiently.

Let's recap, the two things we need to make a "magnetic vortex"
1) magnetic field
2) relative motion of axis of spin to observer

A) not all magnetic fields have an observable vortex
B) most spinning things in our universe have a relative motion to wherever we are observing it from.
   Note: we may have to change our perspective to observe a vortex.

[minnie]

   What are the forces experienced by a compass needle when it's
interacting with the earth's field?
   Are the long sides of the needle forced from each side?
I only hope the CycleGuy's chain hasn't come off or something
as he hasn't shown up for a couple of days.
   Atom, I'm sure you're on the right track with your harmonics.

[CycleGuy]

No, I'm still here. I've been reading from start to finish of this thread, I'm at page 256 right now, should be caught up in a couple days. It's slow going, because I'm also reading the side threads that others talk about. I'm reading the Karpen Pile thread right now, then I'll resume reading this thread.

[sadang]

No, I'm still here. I've been reading from start to finish of this thread, I'm at page 256 right now, should be caught up in a couple days. It's slow going, because I'm also reading the side threads that others talk about. I'm reading the Karpen Pile thread right now, then I'll resume reading this thread.

Don't hurry too much, you have all time in the world because this topic will reach easy 1000 pages without people understanding something,  the same as what happened on Kapanadze topic. There were invested great resources of time, money and will to understand and replicate the Kapanadze device, but they fail because still continue even today to understand his device thinking in the current electromagnetic paradigm. The same will happen here where besides the fact that people don't really want to lean on the Ken's theory and just make useless and malicious remarks about it, everyone who try to understand still try to understand it in the same paradigm of thinking. Wrong premises, wrong development, wrong results!