Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[minnie]

   I did a bit of searching.
   YouTube "Can I see more stars from space" The Bad Astronomer.  Phil Plait.


    I can't see that viewing film or those Ferrocell things can give us a picture of
   magnetic fields.


   The Earth is a magnet and an Inductor Compass works so there must be fixed
    lines of flux.


   What are all these diagrams of hypotrochoids or whatever showing us?
    Are they like wheels within wheels?


    Somehow I get the idea that a film or cell would need to be at right angles
    to the field to get a very thin slice of the action.

[CycleGuy]

It's people like you (Atom) and the rest of the believers who are truly awake and aware of what's really going on at this pivotal moment in history.

Atommix93rdAtom1 has already demonstrated that he will say contradictory things, waffle in his support or nonsupport of posters dependent upon whatever contradictory thing he's saying at the moment, and that he not only has little grasp upon the physical reality of how the universe operates, but apparently little grasp upon reality itself. I invite him to demonstrate his "nuclear battery" to prove his claims, but alas, he'll keep yelling in capslock, rather than prove anything. You know it, we all know it. If he had anything, he would have shown it long prior.

The rest of the world will wake up when it all goes public and then we can say we tried to tell them all along.

I am 100% certain that nothing that comes from applying Mr. Wheeler's hobby theory will ever "go public"... mainly because when you operate from a flawed perception of reality, the odds of you creating something that actually works are vanishingly small.

Hey, I've already provided you in this very thread the means by which you can create a device that extracts energy from the QVZPE field, in full accordance with QM, if you were quick-witted enough to pick up on it. Why not stick with reality? It makes explaining how things work ever so much easier, after all.

That's not the only  method of doing so, however. Haisch and Moddel have demonstrated another way, if you care to do your research. Look for their patent. Aspden has demonstrated yet another way. Look for his patents. Remember, we live on a planet in intimate contact with the QVZPE field, which extends throughout the universe... we are not on a "closed system" planet, it is quite open. Thus, perpetual motion of the second kind is easily achieved, because we're not dealing with thermodynamics, we're dealing with electrodynamics. There is no energy penalty for manipulating a lower QVZPE field radiation pressure (especially utilizing magnets, which directly affect QVZPE field density), then extracting energy from the differential between it and ambient. It's merely a take on Dynamical Casimir Effect, after all, which has been used to concretize photons directly from the QVZPE field.

They're either foolish or just plain scared to death of reality.

Or Occam's Razor... Mr. Wheeler is so far out to left field with his hobby theory that there is no way anyone, after doing even a cursory examination of the basic tenets of his hobby theory, would believe it, unless they were so uneducated that they wouldn't be able to tell if his hobby theory reflected reality in the first place. His hobby theory's tenets would result in a universe that could not exist, as I've proven.

Your "evidence" consists of someone creating a video while claiming he's not moving the magnet nor the coil of wire, yet he's creating electrical pulses as evidenced on his oscilloscope... this is a blatant misrepresentation of the laws of induction. It's not the magnet or the wire that must move, it's the relative motion between the magnetic flux and the wire that creates the current... and his slapping a hunk of ferrous metal down onto the magnet most certainly moves the magnetic lines of flux. In other words, he's not doing anything new.

That Mr. Wheeler responded to that video expressing his approval of it, while neglecting to mention that what was witnessed in the video was to be entirely expected and has been known about since Michael Faraday first discovered the phenomenon of magnetic induction speaks volumes as to just how shallow Mr. Wheeler's knowledge is as pertains to the fundamentals of magnetism, and just how desperate for attention Mr. Wheeler is... he'll seek it even from people who are blatantly wrong (even more wrong than Mr. Wheeler himself), as long as they support his hobby theory.

This isn't the first instance of Mr. Wheeler displaying his fundamental misconceptions about how the universe works, as I've proven above as regards electrons. Mr. Wheeler says "electrons" don't exist, that they're not particles, and are instead waves... except electromagnetic waves travel by necessity at the speed of light (whatever the speed of light is for whatever medium the electromagnetic waves are travelling through), whereas cathode rays (electrons) travel far slower, something that's been known since 1897... that's because electrons are particles, not waves, they have rest mass, and like all matter, they reject QVZPE field modes longer than their radius (the Compton radius, in this instance), which is what accounts for their rest mass.

Similarly, his contention that "warped space is the product of a warped mind", then his speaking of a temporal "counterspacial" component to magnetism just as QM does (except Mr. Wheeler redefines everything to hide this fact) is disingenuous of him, and shows that he cannot close the holes in his hobby theory without falling back on what QM has already discovered, described and fully explained.

Similarly, his contention that there is no such thing as mass-energy equivalency shows his fundamental lack of understanding, as I've proven via the flux compression generator (FCG) bomb example... the EMP from a FCG is not a result of nuclear binding energy, it's a purely mass equivalency phenomenon, since it's a conventional chemical explosion creating the EMP, not a nuclear explosion.

And while we're on the topic of nuclear, his contention that a nuclear bomb explosion leaves all the constituent particles of the bomb intact but scattered, and the explosion was merely a result of what he calls "an unwinding of trillions of clock springs" (his naive take on nuclear binding energy), and if one were to gather up all the particles, one could rebuild that bomb is so far wrong as to be laughable. It goes back to his denial of mass-energy equivalency... but his denial of same means that in his universe there can therefore be no unstable elements that transmute (fission) in attempting to reach their lowest energy state (said unstably high energy states forced upon those elements by the highly energetic conditions of an exploding supernova transmuting those elements from iron by adding energy to them that was converted to mass via nuclear reaction)... therefore there can be no transmutation, no fission, no fusion, the Periodic Table must be a fantasy land of made-up elements, particle accelerators must be a big lie, nuclear reactors must be powered by pixie dust, and Soddy and Rutherford were just hallucinating.

As to his magnet theory, he's just wrong. Flat out, plain wrong. There is no "dielectric inertial plane" (given that he's redefined "dielectricity" to mean "static electricity" and "inertia" to mean "the opposite of rest", thus he might as well say "static electricity in motion"... or just "electricity"). The Bloch Wall is where the two prevalent magnetic domain directions in a magnet (because our magnetic material is too weak to resist the internal magnetic stress, so some domains unpin and flip to minimize the internal energy of the magnet... so in essence, we have two magnets interspersed throughout each conventional magnet, in opposing directions, but with their spins 180 degrees out) meet and mutually cancel, thus the magnetic domains in the Bloch Wall region cant away from the two prevalent magnetic domain directions (and thus this region has an essentially random magnetization and thus can be considered "unmagnetized"), throwing out / attracting in magnetic flux (Larmor radiation in the form of virtual photons, which are a component of the QVZPE field), which causes some of the magnetic flux to arch across to / from the Bloch Wall. If we had perfect magnetic material, we'd have all the magnetic domains aligned in the same direction, and we'd see an attractive (centripetal) interface on one pole face, pulling virtual photons from the QVZPE field, and a repulsive (centrifugal) interface on the opposite pole face, throwing out virtual photons that are then subsumed back into the QVZPE field, and no Bloch Wall. In a conventional magnet, we have the centripetal and centrifugal interfaces on both pole faces. Thus, in a conventional magnet, the most energetically conservative route for the virtual photons to take is from the centrifugal interface on one pole face, into the QVZPE field, out of the QVZPE field and into the centripetal interface on the same pole face (just as David LaPoint demonstrates), then through the magnet to the opposite pole face to follow a similar route... the virtual photons are compelled to follow that route because a magnet is a strange attractor (I'll leave research on that subject up to you), albeit a folded strange attractor. Thus the magnet is continually exchanging energy with the QVZPE field. The temporal aspects of magnetism have already been discussed in this thread, so I won't go into them here.

In short, follow Mr. Wheeler's hobby theory to your own detriment. You'll not learn anything worthy nor invent anything that works by doing so because Mr. Wheeler's hobby theory is unadulterated bunk. It is not just wrong, it is Coulomb bomb wrong.

[Acca]

Atom thanks and will take you up on the device offer here is my email is  Magnetvortex@gmail.com

You are right.. I will load up a clip for you on my YT channel how the magnet (scaler) wave is seen as in a plasma..

and time bubble generation...It's really real...One can slow down chemical reactions.. or speed up...

Acca..

[sadang]

TinselKoala, let's stop this game. I say a thing you say other thing. Exactly the game I don't like to play.


Here are the words of Neil from 1970 interview on BBC:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtdcdxvNI1o


"The sky is deep black when viewed from the Moon as it is when viewed from cisluna space, the space between the Earth and the Moon. The Earth is the only visible object other than the Sun that can be seen although there have been some reports of seeing planets, I myself did not see planets from the surface but I suspect they might be visible."


They did not see the stars both from the lunar surface and from space between Moon and Earth atmosphere. To see means they did not see stars with their eyes, not through optics. I never said stars are not there, I said stars can't be seen by human eyes in the outer space or from the Moon. The outer space has nothing to do with the ISS, ISS is at 400Km and outer space begins from about 10,000Km. Bellow 10,000Km stars begin to be visible due to the scattering of their light by the Earth atmosphere. And very well visible at the altitude of ISS. Beyond the 10,000Km there is the outer space and stars are invisible to human eyes. But very visible through optics of course.


And unfortunately you still express a point of view, namely your point of view, based on what you believe are "actual facts, confirmed by many experiments and observations, satellites currently in orbit around Earth and around the Sun, and the work of astronauts in the ISS."


My point of view is based on the words of Armstrong from the above mentioned interview and on the confirmation of Aldrin from the bellow movie at min 44:42, "I don't remember seeing any[/size][size=78%]"[/size]
- http://archive.org/details/VJSC_1425Q_Apollo11_F.A.C.T.S._PartQ.wmv
and of course on the words of other and my own understanding.

[joel321]

Element93rd I like how you are bold and not afraid to challenge people. You could be an alien for all I know. Or a retarded person not knowing how to tie his own shoes. But at the end of the day it seems like you have "something" that is very important to share. NOW lets stop! this bullshit of trying to compete with one another and lets help one another DEVELOP this thinking of Benefiting everyone!

Instead of you telling people to email you regarding your ideas (If you email me I will send you the schematic of it and we can talk about it !!! ), NO! Give your ideas for FREEE...no needing emailing you....the stupid will be eliminated by evolution. I AM SORRY YOU ARE PART OF EVOLUTION. YOUR RESPONSIBILITY IS TO TEACH BEFORE YOU DIE! NOT DIE BEFORE YOU LEARN!

You know what's the key? This guy is so smart but yet he is not famous! lol

How do you dissect a frog? lol