Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.


CycleGuy

Nice Deere... drove one like that when I was a kid on the farm. What model is that? Ours was an 8850. I was driving that from 10 years old. We also had several smaller ones.

minnie




    Acca, U.K. Not too far from Stratford upon Avon.
    Cycle, thought you must be a down-to-earth sort
    of fellow. I really appreciate your contribution and
    I'm sort of getting an idea-but it's not so easy when
    one's getting older. I.e. go upstairs for something
    and forget what you went for. I find remembering
    the meaning of new words a challenge and am
    often using a dictionary

CycleGuy

Quote from: minnie on January 29, 2016, 07:35:06 AM
    Ultimate proof looks as if it's getting towards the endangered species category.
     This is what my dog thinks happens with a ferrocell.

Almost... except the magnetic "lines of flux" (what we now know are virtual photons) don't really want to travel from pole face to pole face, and in fact, the great majority of them don't. The most energetically conservative path is as I described prior, out of the anti-vortex (centrifugal) repulsive interface on one of the pole faces, into the QVZPE field, out of the QVZPE field, into the vortex (centripetal) attractive interface on the same pole face, then through the magnet to repeat the process on the opposite pole face.

Remember, a conventional magnet has interspersed throughout it what we can consider to be two magnets... the magnetic material isn't strong enough to resist the magnetic force, so some of the domains unpin and flip to lower the internal energy of the magnet. Thus, we have two predominant magnetic domain directions. This is why you can cut a magnet and still have a N and a S pole in each cut piece.

Because of the above, there are actually two vortexes on each pole face... the Repulsive centrifugal, or what is known as the anti-vortex; and the Attractive centripetal, or what is known as the vortex. Personally, I think 'vortex' and 'anti-vortex' are poor choices of words, as it allows too much confusion with the other applications of the word 'vortex'. Anyway, the Attractive interface pulls virtual photon flux into the magnet from the QVZPE field, the Repulsive interface throws off virtual photon flux, which is then subsumed back into the QVZPE field.

Because magnets directly stress the QVZPE field in this way, and because the QVZPE field is literally the fabric of space-time, the effect is that the Attractive interface in the center of each pole face speeds up time and contracts space, whereas the Repulsive interface on the pole face perimeter slows down time and expands space.

The only reason we see any magnetic flux going "pole to pole" is because of the Bloch Wall... that's where the two opposing magnetic domain directions interspersed throughout a magnet meet and mutually cancel, the magnetic domains in the Bloch Wall region are 'canted' away from the two predominant magnetic domain directions, giving the Bloch Wall essentially a random magnetization, thus we can consider it "unmagnetized".

Because of this "canting", some of the virtual photon flux is thrown off / drawn in at the Bloch Wall, coercing some of the magnetic flux from the pole faces into arcing toward the Bloch Wall. In reality, almost none of the magnetic flux goes pole face to pole face, what we're seeing is magnetic flux arcing between each pole face and the Bloch Wall. If we were to wrap a magnet's Bloch Wall region in a thick layer of diamagnetic material such as bismuth to block the flux thrown off / drawn in there, you'd see that there is almost no magnetic flux pole-face to pole-face. You'd likely also notice that since your magnet is now forced to channel all the virtual photon flux where it's supposed to go rather than frittering some of it away at the Bloch Wall, the magnetic force at the pole faces is stronger.

Here's where I discuss this in more detail, as well as propose an idea for exploiting the magnetic flux to create a motionless electrical generator:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=2576.msg35033#msg35033

minnie




   What we're seeing in ferrocell are real photons. I came across the magneto optic
   Kerr effect.
   Somewhere I came across the idea that virtual photons probably couldn't be
   observed as such and were a means of making calculations.
   Can anything useful be deduced from big examples such as Earth's field,Sun's field
   or Galactic and inter Galactic fields?
   In nature things mostly take a path of least resistance.