Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[minnie]

    I think if you look at "JK plasma magnetics experiment 1" (Tinsel Koala)
  on YouTube that little demo gives a much better picture than Kelly's silly
  Ferrocell images that Kelly doesn't even explain in a satisfactorily.

[Dog-One]

@sadang

Have a look at Dirac's Equation.

I wouldn't expect anyone to fully comprehend its meaning, so look for Don L. Hotson's explanation.  He wrote three nice articles that make more sense than I have come across in years.

The truth is out there, but expect to muck yourself up in a lot of BS first.

[sadang]

@ Dog-One
I did not read yet these articles and I'll do in next days, in my spare time. However the Dirac sea of negative energy is a well known subject for seekers of free energy.
- http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf
- http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart2.pdf

I just have to emphasize that even with this theory that somehow fill the missing volume of the Universe, it still work with discrete and quantifiable values which don't go deeper than Plank's level. And the truth of "common sense" should tell each one interested to understand more than just waste time with hard math, that before to have something which can be quantified, there should be something else, a seed with continuum characteristic. Continuum not static!

@ minie
The question is Kelly don't explain correct or are you unable to understand it? An ionized gas is not the same thing as an ferrofluid.

[Acca]

It's so nice that I am not the only one who reads http://www.infinite-energy.com/


Acca...

as you have posted in the pdf files by Hotson..
[/font]

[sadang]

No Acca, you are not the only one! I recommend you other two magazines; New Energy Magazine and Journal of New Energy. And of course and why not, the Physical Review, Science Magazin and Scientific American. And others that are too freaky for common sense people!