Overunity electrolysis - 31 times more effective gas production than with DC

[MarkE]

The paid internet skeptic conspiracy theory is as ridiculous today as it has ever been.

At the end of the day someone can produce evidence that supports their claims or they do not.  If Bill Alek were delivering on his claims no one would pay attention to anyone saying that his claims are the bunk that they are, because under those circumstances, they obviously would not be bunk, and no amount of argument could change the obvious.  The problem for Bill Alek is the same problem that has plagued countless proponents of outrageous claims:  He cannot produce the goods.  Measurements: indifferent, good, or as in this case: very bad, do not make power supplies that operate for free.

[profitis]

Paid or not,shills can be a good thing for one reason: when they do post and are successfully countered,only truth remains. Disinformationists are the dangerous ones,but they too can be quikly put in their place if spotted.

[MarkE]

Paid or not,shills can be a good thing for one reason: when they do post and are successfully countered,only truth remains. Disinformationists are the dangerous ones,but they too can be quikly put in their place if spotted.

Lies are always a problem.  There are lies some tell to others, and there are the worse lies that one uses to fool oneself into believing something one merely wishes.  Fortunately, rational people seek and weigh evidence.  Most often that results in finding the truth of matters.

[TinselKoala]

Acca...  you must be one of those legendary Paid Lurkers! Long time member but only a few posts and almost all of them insulting someone. Non-contributor! Bad Speller! LURKER!

You are probably collecting everybody's Free Energy designs into your little black notebook, which you will use in your Secret Lurkatory to construct all those items that nobody else has been able to get lurking. Er, working, I mean. I've got YOUR number, Paid Lurker.



(Don't Paid Lurkers have spelling checkers or dictionaries? Apparently not.)

[profitis]

So true @mark E,so true.but even non-self-deception needs criticism. open replicable experiments rule,wether failure or not.