Overunity electrolysis - 31 times more effective gas production than with DC

[MarkE]

The Brother of Stan Meyers ( Stephen ) admitted in an interview that Stan didnt know what was happening.

To this day, not a single witness has popped up to confirm the achievements of Stan, nor did anybody replicate his work.

The company xogen is the only company who was making an actual product, they seem to have dissapeared.

Regarding Stan, It is my belief that he was milking money as he was still in research phase.

His brother said in a radio interview that he further researched this, and that his sytem was more refined, his sytem is described in his patent, wich was rejected.

His system revolved around dual 3 phase generator, with phase cancelling interference antennas, and somekind of ringing network.

There was also a switch of polarity, by relay.

6 sets of tubes, these sets were composed of 3 tubes each.

The frequency was in the 400 hz range, I originally thought that for experimental work, an electronic emulation of 3 phase would be more suitable.

So I built the circuit above. What advantage does this hold over simple pulsing, this answer is deep within the research mind of Stephen Meyers.

Having worked all his life in radar, having invented all his life, Stephen Meyers is certainly one of the most knowledgeable figures on the planet.

If one of you thinks he has the engineering skill to pull it off, circuit is there. I doubt even doctor of EE can do this, difficulty level is AAA, multi-domain.

Edit: it seems like xogen is going strong, they re-appeared now.

Things we know:
Stan Meyer made extraordinary over unity claims.
Stan Meyer never proved his extraordinary claims.
Stan Meyer was found by an Ohio judge to have perpetrated an "egregious fraud" against his investors.
Stan Meyer's claims have not been successfully reproduced.

That's not a very encouraging set of facts.  If Stan's surviving brother or anyone else can show greater than Faraday efficiency electrolyzing water, they stand to become very rich.  If they break unity, that changes to incredibly rich.  If someone succeeds at managing what the Japanese paper from 2005 was trying to do which is maintain Faraday efficiency in a scalable way they still stand to make a lot of money.  I don't know why anyone who could manage any of these objectives would sit on such a wonderful discovery.

[ARMCORTEX]

Not very encouraging I agree.

But it looks better for Stan`s brother, who is engineer with much experience.

Navy engineer, wich much much background. Are you saying he is not credible ? He is zeus like, crusher.

Im sure he went farther than what the university researcher go.

No doubt he knows of the effect of this document.

[MarkE]

Not very encouraging I agree.

But it looks better for Stan`s brother, who is engineer with much experience.

Navy engineer, wich much much background. Are you saying he is not credible ? He is zeus like, crusher.

Im sure he went farther than what the university researcher go.

No doubt he knows of the effect of this document.

Whatever he may or may not know or claim, he has not presented an electrolyzer that exceeds Faraday efficiency.  In a way this is sort of like the Papp engine and the two Rohner brothers.  John Rohner has been caught lying so many times it isn't funny including claims to multiple PhD's when under oath he has admitted to only a high school education.  He's fighting a lawsuit by the SEC, and faces a DoJ criminal action behind that.  Then there is his brother Bob Rohner who is an accomplished mechanical engineer with a real degree.  Bob's been trying for many years but still has never publicly shown that he can get any excess energy out of noble gasses.

[ARMCORTEX]

No doubt, he has the qualifications, background to replicate this document.

Why dont we see implementation of that document, I dont understand.

It is identical to the xogen patent

I was following the xogen thing when they had their test plant, but they just dissapeared prior to that.

What were results ? Nothing is known.

[ARMCORTEX]

The thing that strikes me the most about Stephen`s patent is first of all, why he chose 6 cells, why he chose such complex signals.

This is structure buiding IMHO. His only clue in his interview, was, why is snow white, and some unrelated mention of radiation, cell radiates.

But from other prior designs not necessary.

What I think is necessary, as Ltseung says, is kinetic energy. In patent application of Stephen there is mention of mechanical vibration of the cell itself.