Inertia Drive project. RFDD.

[tinman]

A true working reactionless drive would violate Conservation of Momentum.  It is one of the First Principles.  Violating it would have profound implications for the way that we think the world around us works.

Thanks Mark for the reply.

I am in the process of joining all the test video's together-i think your going to like the result's.
I have also completed the first test of second stage test,where as the pressure cleaner wand is now mounted on the pendulum. I think your going to like that test even more.

The first test video result's(as depicted a few post ago) should be up within 1 to1 1/2 hours. Once we discus those test,and eliminate any faults with the test i may have made,then i will post the second video showing the result's of the completed unit so far.

I also believe there is a better way than using the high pressure water jet,and would give a much better result. This would eliminate the need for the high pressure cleaner,and use only an electric motor. This new system could also be driven off the back side of the pump motor,thus meaning we need only the one motor to do the job. I will start the build on the new part of the device tomorrow.

[CANGAS]

A true working reactionless drive would violate Conservation of Momentum.  It is one of the First Principles.  Violating it would have profound implications for the way that we think the world around us works.

Could you be so generous as to write out some specific examples of how it would be violation of COM? You know, quote "one of the First Principles", and then, explain in exact detail how and why the "one of the First Principles" is being violated?

Sweeping general statements are so easy to make.....

LOL! I just did it myself!


CANGAS 71

[tinman]

Here is the test carried out today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8as20q1CYE&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

[MarkE]

Could you be so generous as to write out some specific examples of how it would be violation of COM? You know, quote "one of the First Principles", and then, explain in exact detail how and why the "one of the First Principles" is being violated?

Sweeping general statements are so easy to make.....

LOL! I just did it myself!


CANGAS 71

Momentum is the product of mass and its velocity.     

Conservation of momentum is a First Principle. 

CoM means that momentum within a system is some constant value. Therefore if within some system, change of momentum in one thing requires a matching sum change of momentum  of other items in the system.

A reactionless drive alters the velocity of the driven object in isolation.

[CANGAS]

Momentum is the product of mass and its velocity.     

Conservation of momentum is a First Principle. 

CoM means that momentum within a system is some constant value. Therefore if within some system, change of momentum in one thing requires a matching sum change of momentum  of other items in the system.

A reactionless drive alters the velocity of the driven object in isolation.

I will generously assume that you made your very best effort to explain your discontent re reactionless drive in SPECIFIC TERMS and examples.

Thank you for doing your best.

I suggest that you immediately investigate the meaning of "specific" in your nearest dictionary.


CANGAS 74