Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[MarkE]

I have a riddle to solve: Let's say we have 6 "Lenz Delay Coils" facing one rotor of 16 magnets. Now, what difference would it make to have the same 6 "Lenz Delay Coils" facing 3 rotors of 48 magnets, 2 coils per rotor? All the magnets equal strength, all the rotors equal diameter, and equal power supplied to the axle bearings.

Quote from Gotoluc's Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal input power:

"In my design I use the most powerful magnet available and have the magnet itself (or PM field) as cores for the coil. In this kind of arrangement we only need a very small amount of input energy for the coil to create work".

There's an inverse relationship here!

As Gotoluc adds magnets to his coil core his pull power increases per watt of coil power.

As we add rotor axle magnets, the "Lenz Delay Coils" increase propulsion and output per watt of input.

Increasing the number of "Lenz propulsion Coils" around a fixed number of magnets splits the propulsion between the coils instead of adding to the advantage, following the "Law of Diminishing Returns". This is similar to increasing the number of regular "Lenz Drag" output coils; They merely share the available output rather then multiply it.

However, when we add magnets to the wave reflector coils, the propulsion increases! We'd get three times the reflection off three mirrors then we would from one. Adding rotor magnets to normal "Lenz Drag Coils" would increase the drag along with output but require additional input, so power in equals power out. The "Lenz Propulsion Coil" has an opposite relationship to the addition of more magnets! Very simple once you understand it.

Get your hands on some FEM software that has a magnetics package and you can explore such questions from the comfort of your computer.

[synchro1]

@MarkE,

Thank you MarkE!

I need to drive to ACE hardware in San Jose for the non-magnetic ball bearings and aluminum tube. A 6 volt lantern battery can serve as a power source. The two wooden flywheels can be replaced with PVC end caps and pipe. Rings of magnets can be glued to the pipe and covered with tape. The output would be A.C. The output coils wired in series might illuminate an incandescent bulb. This self runner needs a load! The bearings will get hot and cause trouble if it doesn't start turning on its own. This generator will relegate Thane Hein's scooter to a museum if it works.

[synchro1]

3:00 minuutes into this video we can see the kind of PVC magnet rotor I plan to use:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgkoxbS5rHk&feature=channel


The axle holes in the PVC end caps need to be precisely centered. A professional machine shop can accomplish this kind of high tolerance drilling. Naturally, lowering the "Lenz Delay Threshold" through the addition of disk magnets attached to the back of the ferrite output coil cores will result in a lowering of output. 

[Bob Smith]

Hey Synch
Something I read from the Keppe Motor people that seems to relate what you're describing:

The true Alternating Current is Pulsed Direct Current because it works more in accordance with nature. Since PDC is an interrupted current, it does not offer any resistance to the second, returning component of Essential Energy, which begins to act naturally, moving in the same direction as the external movement of the rotor but in the opposite direction as the first, pulsed component. This actually completes the full energy cycle, as if power were pumping in from the scalar field from its natural internal vibration. The rotor spins much more efficiently, with dramatically reduced electrical consumption, and almost zero heat loss.

Source: Keppe Motor Manual - Working Principles PP 16- 17 http://www.pure-energy.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/keppe_motor_manual_v1.1_-_working_principle.pdf
Website:  http://www.pure-energy.info/
Suerte!
Bob

[synchro1]

@Bob Smith,


                   Once again Bob, thanks for your very valuable Keppe upload. Keppe's collecting backspike energy from the coil collapse through the Reed switch and calling it ZPE. I argued with "Tinsel Streamers" that A.C. produced a a field collapse also when the polarity reversed. Keppe's rotor has too much mass to magnetic field ratio to react to the sine wave like TK's tiny neo disk spinner. Both power with identical double coils.


                    Generally, "Lenz Delay Output Coils" share the magnetic rotor field strength. Increasing the number of "Wave Reflector Coils" divides the strength and the propulsion of a fixed number of rotor magnets. Increasing the number or the strength of the rotor magnets increases the "Reflected wave" along with the propulsion. The "Muller Motor" rotor employs both poles of the magnet rotors, along with magnet core output coils. Muller really didn't understand how to control the effect. Altering the output coil core viscosity requires a repositioning of the output coil itself in relation to the rotor field to sustain the propulsion effect. Adding additional rings of magnets to the common rotor and allowing for output coil positioning along a ferrite core perfects the "Muller" concept.


                     The comparison of the "Lenz Delay Wave Reflector Coil" and rotor magnets to source light and reflective mirrors helps: One candle and two mirrors has half the reflected light power of two candles and one mirror.