Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[MarkE]

@MarkE,


You have it backwards! I commented on a video he uploaded of a "Coil Core Magnet Spinner" he gave me credit for innovating. I was among the first builders to begin experimenting with this approach nearly nine years ago, and I believe the first person to succeed at building a "Sine Wave Harmonic Self Accelerator".


I believe that the spinner picked up on a third harmonic of fractional amplitude, and climbed the Harmonics in "Barkhausen Spikes" to the bifilar's self resonating frequency where it's speed stabilized.


Try lighting a D.C. filament bulb with a D.C. pulse at 180Kz. What an incredible display! The light is separated into standing waves that form a spherical magnetic field as if it were a planetary field. Truly Fantastic! This frequency is the "Oscillating Frequency of Magnetisem" and has nothing to do with ferrite characteristics. TinselKoala denies it exists!

Synchro1, in message #6 you asked:

What do you make of TK's sine wave spinner that acts as a "Negative Load" in regards to your views on power shunting? Think about this; How much input do you think the spinner would feed back into the tank?

That invited TK to comment and he did. 

This statement: 

Try lighting a D.C. filament bulb with a D.C. pulse at 180Kz. What an incredible display! The light is separated into standing waves that form a spherical magnetic field as if it were a planetary field. Truly Fantastic! This frequency is the "Oscillating Frequency of Magnetisem" and has nothing to do with ferrite characteristics. TinselKoala denies it exists!

Has several problems:

180KHz is so far above the thermal time constant of the filament that what you have is a light dimmer.  You can prove this to yourself with a function generator, an N MOSFET, a battery or bench supply, the light bulb and a photo detector circuit.  Put the bulb and the photo detector in an opaque box:  drive the bulb and read the photodetector output on an oscilloscope.  At a fraction of 1 Hz the bulb will turn on and off pretty much completely.  At a few Hz, the bulb will glow still showing a significant light variation in the IR.  Above 100Hz, there will be very little variation.

Standing waves occur when there are reflections in the transmission path.  Turning a transmitting source on and off would only establish a standing wave when the distance between reflectors is an even multiple of a quarter wavelength.  For light with wavelengths in the half micrometer range you need extreme precision in the distance and stability of the distance to get a standing wave pattern.  You need fine distances such as found in a diffraction grating.  To set up standing waves from the pulses at 180kHz, you need to separate the reflectors by a distance of: (2n)*3E8*0.25/180E3   That's multiples of 5/6 km.   That's one big box.

[TinselKoala]

@MarkE,


TK is an egocentric sadist. I am unwilling to stand for his abuse. He denied the existence of the "Negative Mico Henry" and  "Magnetic Resonance", he also preaches "Atheism!" He portrays me as a fraud. He's challenging us to supply material proof of a Creator, in denial of everything sacred in the Universe. Who wants to be preached to about Holiness from a shabby "Row House Basement"?


Wiring a  0 to 10 pico farad variable trimmer capacitor to the series bifilar would not only eliminate the need for a "Super Cray" calculation for fixed bifilar tank capacitance, but set at zero, would allow for the ground only test. The only other possibility as I see it, would be to investigate the possibility of a Reed Switch oscillation type fluttering. Most of those switches are crap and wind up sticking right off the bat.

You are a liar and a fool. You constantly misrepresent my work and the work of others and you do a disservice by misleading those who may not know better than to fall for your misinterpretations and your BS.
If that's not bad enough.... you are just WRONG.


You cannot support the contentions you make about me with references, links, checkable outside facts or demonstrations of your own. In short, you are an obnoxious blowhard fool. How long did it take you to start "your" thread, after being asked how many times to stop posting your irrelevant and wrong nonsense in another thread where a different discussion was going on? You don't have a leg to stand on.


If you want me to stay out of your way, THEN STOP MISREPRESENTING ME AND MY WORK. For about the hundredth time, in this thread and others you have been told that. But like the fool you are, you do not learn and you persist in your errors. You cannot even grasp the fact that I know a _lot_ more  than you do about Tesla, his work, his apparatus, and the theoretical and actual performance of tuned circuits and Tesla power systems in general -- as demonstrated many times in my various videos. But you are so stuffed up with your BS misconceptions and misinterpretations that you are incapable of learning. As you continue to demonstrate.

[synchro1]

Figure 2, the crystal oscillator frequencies are adjusted with a small 50pF rotary capacitor. With the circuit as shown, with a five-volt power supply, the audio output frequency range is 10 Hz to a little over 2 kHz. The gates used are all belong to the first generation TTL group. It is very beneficial if the inside circuit is known to save many hours spent on discovery work.

[synchro1]

The Android I-Phone audio frequency generator we've seen Daniel Nunez demonstrate would probably do an excellent job! The frequency's adjusted by a bar slider on the I-Phone screen! Nunez ties into an amplifier to control power.

[synchro1]

@TinselKoala,


Go fly a kite!