Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[synchro1]

Tesla patented the "Ball Bearing motor" demonstrated at 3:55 into this video by Chris Carson:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lqMiZPO9TM

This platform is the most elegant of all for the "Lenz Delay Coil" test yet:

A conductive axle connects the inner race then attaches to a flywheel. The battery electrodes connect to the outer race and voila! Spinergy! Non- magnetic materials would allow for a large diametric disk magnet to double task as a flywheel and a magnet rotor!

[Bob Smith]

Here's another one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7LOF1GZpdo
bob

[synchro1]

@Bob Smith,

Thank you very much Bob! Run's on A.C. or D.C. in either direction. Central positioning of the rotor makes more sense.  Here's the second video in the series:


                                                                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1xnQ9gWy1o

[synchro1]

Placing 16 magnets on each wooden disc would multiply the R.P.M the output coils see by a factor of 8. 5k hertz R.P.M would equal 40k R.P.M. That's luxury for the "Lenz Delay Threshold" R.P.M. test.  These rotor magnets would eliminate the kind of current deflection described by the "Laplace effect". The high amperage torque is very powerful, sufficient to accelerate two of these rotors rapidly to high speed.

We can easily fit 4 "Ferrite Core Lenz Delay Coils" in perpendicular adjacency to these rotors. 8 would not present a problem. A 3rd rotor would perhaps allow for 12 of these propulsion coils. 6 volts maximum and 10 amps is really "Hog Swilling", but with 12 propulsion coils  to assist, we might be able to disconnect the battery!

[synchro1]

I have a riddle to solve: Let's say we have 6 "Lenz Delay Coils" facing one rotor of 16 magnets. Now, what difference would it make to have the same 6 "Lenz Delay Coils" facing 3 rotors of 48 magnets, 2 coils per rotor? All the magnets equal strength, all the rotors equal diameter, and equal power supplied to the axle bearings.

Quote from Gotoluc's Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal input power:

"In my design I use the most powerful magnet available and have the magnet itself (or PM field) as cores for the coil. In this kind of arrangement we only need a very small amount of input energy for the coil to create work".

There's an inverse relationship here!

As Gotoluc adds magnets to his coil core his pull power increases per watt of coil power.

As we add rotor axle magnets, the "Lenz Delay Coils" increase propulsion and output per watt of input.

Increasing the number of "Lenz propulsion Coils" around a fixed number of magnets splits the propulsion between the coils instead of adding to the advantage, following the "Law of Diminishing Returns". This is similar to increasing the number of regular "Lenz Drag" output coils; They merely share the available output rather then multiply it.

However, when we add magnets to the wave reflector coils, the propulsion increases! We'd get three times the reflection off three mirrors then we would from one. Adding rotor magnets to normal "Lenz Drag Coils" would increase the drag along with output but require additional input, so power in equals power out. The "Lenz Propulsion Coil" has an opposite relationship to the addition of more magnets! Very simple once you understand it.