Spiral track acceleration...

[iacob alex]

.....at :  www.evert.de/eft323e.htm


We can find all around us the increasing ( decreasing ) spiral trajectory , related to  all kind of motions , from fractals to galaxies.


When the natural motion of  energy is manifest , his path is a spiral / vortex.


Related with the subject of forum's topic , there is a simple manner to play energy : we can store the gravity fall energy ( 0*-180* ) , then to "release " it , into an upward spiral trajectory ( 181*-360* ) , alike a sling motion of a trebuchet...free gravity fall into free rotational " fall "...


      Al_ex

[iacob alex]

.....at : http://energythic.com/view.php?node=197
     Starting with a simple device ( sprinkler ) , then thinking about a gravity powered lever ( trebuchet ) .....due to the same Coriolis effect , but as a self-motion one...
     Al_ex

[iacob alex]

.....at : http://energythic.com/view.php?node=197
     Starting with a simple device ( sprinkler ) , then thinking about a gravity powered lever ( trebuchet ) .....due to the same Coriolis effect , but as a self-motion one...
     Take a look at : https://youtu.be/mcPs_OdQOYU

     So , the problem is to explain the working of an old and well known gravity powered simple machine ( trebuchet ) with the help of the Coriolis effect , then to use this possible "gate"  for a self powered gravity device...
     Al_ex

[conradelektro]

Prof. Alfred Evert likes to write books and web pages, but does not show that his "functional model" really works:

http://www.evert.de/ap0520e.pdf
http://www.evert.de/bookf.htm

It would be simple to demonstrate the thrust of this "closed cylinder with a rotor in it", but he does not care to do that. Why?

Words and drawings are cheap, but a functioning model is obviously not feasible. Every serious inventor would show a functioning model, it is the only thing that counts. Why is Evert not doing this very important step?

Greetings, Conrad

[iacob alex]

   Hi !
About the feasibility of Evert's proposals there are some doubts , because a little experience often upsets a lot of ( his...) fheory.
Here , we have a "face-to-face" of the existing :
  www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/TRANSPORT/helica/helica.htm
  www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/TRANSPORT/proprail/proprail.htm
...with his "closed cylinder with a rotor in it".
The answer resides in the available efficiency of the comparison...or how we play the free/non-free spiral acceleration face to the same power input.

  Al_ex