New Scalar Wave Detector and laws of Scalar Physics

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

Just a heads up - re: the two papers sited in my last post - IMHO;
on their face, these two articles, and far-too-many others of the same
ilk, are the scourge of serious efforts towards this research.

Sorry for even referencing them - I will now lie and claim they were included
to show a terrible example of the garbage that's readily available on the
subject.

They do contain some (questionable) useful information so I threw them in
in an attempt to look like a Hot-Shot. It didn't work, did it?

The wave classification is still valid however!

Maybe I should "self ban" for a while - Offense: posting utter Technical TRASH...

Have a productive week and a great weekend!

FIN

[antimony]

Funny how this topic came up on o/u now,  because i have been trying to make the Hadowanec scala wave detector, so I have been tinkering with op amps to learn how to use them to make a amplifier.
Probably someone already brought it up, but Bedini have some sort of modified schema out there on the internet on a scala wave detector.


There is a brilliant guy on youtube called Benjamin Brandwood thats been uploading videos on this topic a few years back, but he didnt give a schematic or anything.

[conradelektro]

Funny how this topic came up on o/u now,  because i have been trying to make the Hadowanec scala wave detector, so I have been tinkering with op amps to learn how to use them to make a amplifier.
Probably someone already brought it up, but Bedini have some sort of modified schema out there on the internet on a scala wave detector.

There is a brilliant guy on youtube called Benjamin Brandwood thats been uploading videos on this topic a few years back, but he didnt give a schematic or anything.

It is very instructive to tinker with OpAmps and very weak electromagnetic signals can be detected with a suitable circuit. Such a circuit to detect weak electromagnetic signals or fields is the circuit from Hadowanec, see e.g. at http://www.rexresearch.com/hodorhys/xptgwsig/xptgwsig.htm (I also attached the circuit from that site).

Now, look at the circuit, it can only detect electromagnetic signals or fields which influence the capacitor C1 or the resistor R1.

How does a capacitor C1 or a resistor R1 react to a scalar wave? And how does one know it reacted to a scalar wave and not to an electromagnetic signal or field?


Very similar circuits are used to measure atmospheric charge https://www.electroschematics.com/5751/atmospheric-charge-monitor/

Greetings, Conrad

[sm0ky2]

When a real scalar wave passes through
anything metal will ionize and make hissing/crackling sounds
it is physically perceptible on your person
and, although there was no direct "sound"
the pressure change was 'audible'


electronics momentarily cease or turn off when encountered by
the event horizon


even the sense of vision 'blips' as if your had hopped quickly
(one person though it was a moving polarization effect on scattered light)




certain materials,
for instance, like a particular ionizing polymer,
can become charged ahead of the wavefront and be propelled (dragged) by it


it can instantly sterilize a cultured dish
and ignite combustible gasses


the physiological effects?........
"If Marie Curie was told the future, would that have stopped her?"


the contents of closed vessels incur momentary pressure increase


piezoelectric plates emit an electrical impulse following the wave




when a jet goes supersonic
we don't need a thing called a "shockwave detector"
scalar waves don't hide from us

[sm0ky2]

Personally I am convinced it has to be some sort of atmospheric effect
like the earth 'kicking back' to something we are doing to it


the amount of funding directed towards doing it in space
says that they have a different view