Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[allcanadian]

Physicists resort to imaginary particles that travel from the primary of a transformer to the secondary of the transformer.  These are called virtual photons.   Other virtual particles travel from somewhere unknown that create the charge of an electron or proton.  These virtual particles are responsible for the magnetic field.   Following this line of reasoning/bs then an isolated electron sits at the center of a magnetic monopole as does a proton.   There is absolutely no way to tell if the two particles are reacting due to the magnetic field or the electric field as the two appear to be produced by the same flow of virtual particles.

[/size]


Heretic!... Burn the witch , burn the witch!


Or sorry wrong thread.
AC

[MarkE]

[/size]


Heretic!... Burn the witch , burn the witch!


Or sorry wrong thread.
AC

How did he get that nose? Can we build a bridge out of him?

[allcanadian]

@Mark

Permeable, IE magnetically active materials present a low resistance (reluctance) to flux.

The problem I have with this theory is that a magnetic source will induce an opposite magnetic field in piece of iron ie Magnetic Induction. The external field aligns the domains of the iron producing a second opposite magnetic field which then couples to the external one. Thus it would seem this is not a lower resistance path it is a second induced magnetic field coupling to the external one.


If we think about it it would seem to be a simple reversed variation of Lenz law, the source always magnetically induces an opposite polarity in the iron however in this case it does not always oppose as in Lenz Law but always attracts. The phenomena are very similar however one relates to Electromagnetic induction and the other Magnetic induction which also relates closely to Electrostatic induction.


If we have a charged sphere is another neutral sphere nearby a path of lower resistance? Well no, the charged spheres external field produces a charge separation in the neutral sphere producing an opposite polarity E field which is attracted to the first charged sphere. No field lines or flow or low resistance paths are required to explain the phenomena, it is a field related phenomena.


AC

[MileHigh]

You are just BSing and making a spectacle of yourself for some perceived gain in Brownie points.

Are you going to answer my questions in post #1242 or is this the end of the merry prankster?  Do you have an "aetheric energy" meter since you state that it is observable?

I guess that he doesn't have an aetheric energy meter.  Call Ghost Busters!

[NoBull]

I'm not even remotely interested in electromagnets, as they consume power to carry out the same job to that of a PM

Superconducting electromagnets don't consume energy continuously.

You can get one for 60EUR from here and see for yourself
http://shop.can-superconductors.com/index.php?id_product=20&controller=product