Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[EMJunkie]

Chris:

The problem is that Walter Lewin is agreeing with me but you are unable to see it.  When he says that the magnetic field is "almost zero" outside the coil, he is referring to the small amount of area just outside the dimensions of the physical coil that is normal to the axis of the coil.  That corresponds to his external wire loop.  If you increase that area to an infinite plane except for the circular disk corresponding to the tunnel of the coil, then the amount of flux goes from "almost zero" to the same amount of flux that is inside the coil.  i.e.; the amount of flux inside the coil is equal to the amount of returning flux outside the coil.

You really need to master the basics and not jump to conclusions.

You just keep kidding yourself MileHigh!

[EMJunkie]

So,, am I understanding this correctly.

You are using this

from 15-4 B verses A

and then actually looking for this in real life??

Not that you are looking for the end products of a mathematical formula but you are looking for what the make believe parts of the formula would be in real life.

Not to mention that those formulas are a way to avoid what??? look up there I quoted it.

Walter and Richard followed the excepted understanding of things,, not because they HAD to but because they came to the same conclusions.  Here you are trying to show that they were not in agreement with what they believed to be true,,  and what that is does not fit with what you have been saying.

If you are trying to describe some intimate information of the magnetic field itself, then I think you should stop calling what you are talking about a "Bloch Wall".  A Block Wall is NOT the field and it seems that you are trying to discuss the field itself,, aka an intimate knowledge of the field and a method to discover it.

Webby1 - I am not looking for ANYTHING but truth!

I have proved twice that you believers are believing in "Conventional Science" that is today proven INCOMPLETE!

YOU PEOPLE are all here searching, what is it that you're ACTUALLY searching for, answers or an argument. It seems the later!

FORGET THE BLOCH WALL for a while! Because if you ACTUALLY read my posts I have not even been talking about this in the last 40 odd posts!

You people are distorted truth seekers, not willing to accept "What if" - get over your god like beliefs!

Then you may get somewhere.

[EMJunkie]

So,, am I understanding this correctly.

You are using this

from 15-4 B verses A

and then actually looking for this in real life??

Not that you are looking for the end products of a mathematical formula but you are looking for what the make believe parts of the formula would be in real life.

Not to mention that those formulas are a way to avoid what??? look up there I quoted it.

Walter and Richard followed the excepted understanding of things,, not because they HAD to but because they came to the same conclusions.  Here you are trying to show that they were not in agreement with what they believed to be true,,  and what that is does not fit with what you have been saying.

If you are trying to describe some intimate information of the magnetic field itself, then I think you should stop calling what you are talking about a "Bloch Wall".  A Block Wall is NOT the field and it seems that you are trying to discuss the field itself,, aka an intimate knowledge of the field and a method to discover it.

Webby1

Walter Lewin, at MIT did 801, 802 and 803 - I don't know if he did any more.

Count how many times Walter Lewin used the Word "Intuitive"

Definition:

adjective 
1. perceiving directly by intuition without rational thought, as a person or the mind.

2. perceived by, resulting from, or involving intuition:
"intuitive knowledge."

3. having or possessing intuition:
"an intuitive person."

4. capable of being perceived or known by intuition.

Can anyone here be "Intuitive" except Tinman and AC?

I have proven that your concepts on the Magnetic Field are Incomplete! Simply because you believe, blindly, that the Magnetic Field is as Science drew it over 100 Years ago with no further Home Work!!!

Do YOUR Home Work! Assume Nothing! Question Everything!

[EMJunkie]

Walter and Richard followed the excepted understanding of things,, not because they HAD to but because they came to the same conclusions.  Here you are trying to show that they were not in agreement with what they believed to be true,,  and what that is does not fit with what you have been saying.

This is a TOTAL Assumption on Your Part!!! See what I am saying!

Just to show how wrong you are:

[EMJunkie]

You  ASS-u-me you are correct, but  you are wrong about me.

I am glad! See the above Video link! It shows once again why people need to stay open minded!