Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 55 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: ramset on January 12, 2015, 10:14:23 PM
TinMan
something to read at Lunch


http://www.pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/How_Parallel_Path_Gets_Over_Unity/


Have a safe trip....
Except that Flynn's parallel path does not get overunity.  Flynn's parallel path concept has been around for many years now.  No one has gotten overunity from it.  Do you want to know why?  It is because the calculations that suggest overunity are wrong.  The work required to double the flux density in a linear magnet from B1 to 2*B1 is: 3x the energy required to develop B1 in the first place, not 1X.  That means that if one prebiases a magnet to say 500G and then takes that magnet to 1000G  they must add three times the original energy.  As any school child should know:  1 + 3 = 4.  Those who thi followers of Flynn incorrectly think that the amount of work required to go from B1 to 2*B1 is the same as that required to go from zero to B1.

EMJunkie

Quote from: MileHigh on January 12, 2015, 06:41:19 PM
Chris:

Well, I shot down your "doers" argument and you are the one that is on the flat Earth.

The majority of your references did NOT support your assertions and I call it "Orwellian madness" when you state that they do.  Here you are trying to "teach" on your YouTube channel and it's revealed that you don't know what you are talking about.  I don't go onto a sewing forum and talk a bunch of BS about sewing because I barely know anything about sewing!!!  You should follow suit.  Don't become another Daniel Nunez.

MileHigh

MileHigh - You little sissy girl!

Pull your head in!

What I do when where and what time of the day has nothing to do with you!

Pull your head in! You hypocritical Ignoramus!

EMJunkie

Quote from: MarkE on January 12, 2015, 07:04:17 PM
"Doing" without understanding may provide hours of entertainment but not enlightenment.  When one performs an experiment and arrives at conclusions that are contrary to thousands, even millions of prior experiments have confirmed, the "doer" has a huge amount of evidence to overcome.  When a "doer" refuses to even listen to explanations of the understanding that those prior experiments have led to, then the "doer" is the proverbial ostrich with its head stuck firmly in the ground.  Why should anyone regard the "doer's" experiments superior to the experiments of the past?If you are still denying the reality that is indisputably in front of you then you are still doing a put on or worse.No, you have been refuted at each turn, even by your own references.  All experimenters agree that when the Hall effect sensor is placed parallel to the dipole that the flux density smoothly changes from a maximum in one direction at one pole to an opposing maximum in the other direction at the opposite pole.  There is no boundary condition at the dipole midpoint.  There si therefore no evidence of a Bloch wall at the dipole midpoint.  There is no evidence of flux curling inward towards the dipole at the dipole midpoint.  Quite the opposite, the evidence all points to the conventional view that flux is most parallel to the dipole axis at the dipole midpoint.With a mountain of evidence gained over 200 years running against you, you are simply and irrefutably in the wrong.YesYesYes, and more usually between domains that are oriented at 90, 180, or 270 degrees to each other.What is that supposed to mean?  If we cut a magnet in half we just end up with a weaker magnet.  If we slice a magnet into three, we just end up with three weaker magnets.  We do not end up with a south monopole, a regular magnet, and a north monopole.It is you who refuse to acknowledge the reality that you call dogma while hanging onto ideas that your own references refute.But it is you who keep repeating things that goes against your own evidence.

Mark - And you just started to make a little impression on me! Now its all gone again!

Cap-Z-ro

Quote from: EMJunkie on January 12, 2015, 11:05:03 PM
Mark - And you just started to make a little impression on me! Now its all gone again!

They do reside in the land of chaos and flux, dontcha know.

Regards...


EMJunkie

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on January 12, 2015, 11:10:53 PM
They do reside in the land of chaos and flux, dontcha know.

Regards...

Yes - the reason I call these two Oil Company Trolls! Where they get paid to ignorantly debate no matter what the topic! They cant even agree to disagree!