Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[EMJunkie]

It's a funny rationalization you use to knowingly lie.

MarkE - Is It? Is it Really? Who do you work for, BP is British Petroleum you know! Or is it BP BS Inc?

[EMJunkie]

It's a funny rationalization you use to knowingly lie.

This might be why you "Prefer" the Grid over all other independent Power Disto Networks? Oh my, its Consolidated Edison that you work for isn't it!

Hahaha - seriously gotta laugh at the obvious! 

[MileHigh]

Hahahahaha More LIES MileHigh!!!!!!! You're cute! Do you have flashing Lights too? Or is that extra?

Here you go EMJunkie:

Post #637 you say this:  "I wonder what the Zero Indication near the Central Point between the Poles is showing?"

How can you not know why there is a zero indication?  Anybody that understands this stuff and has a few brain cells working would expect to see a zero indication.  But you are obviously not in this class.

In post #640, I say this:  "Take a look at the attached diagram and all of your questions are answered" and I post the image of the magnet filing pattern with the blue lines.

Then in post #645 I say this:  "Can you explain what is going on with those broken blue lines?"

In post #646 you say this:  "MileHigh - Unfortunately this is YOUR Assumption. I have nothing to do with your assumptions!"

If you knew what you were talking about you would have stated the answer in your post #646 but you clearly didn't.  It was a Litmus test question, you sensed it was a Litmus test question, and you failed to answer it.  Bluff away all you want, the truth is you don't know your stuff when it comes to magnetics and you just bluff your way through because most of the time your YouTube audience knows even less than you and you can get away with it.  However, you can't fool all of the people all of the time.

[TinselKoala]

@ALL;

The fact that a Magnetic Mono Pole has been predicted for some 83 Years and today created in a Lab proves the debate that MarkE and MileHigh are LYING to people about, shows that they argue ignorantly!

These two guys must be supporting the Other Side!!! Oil Company Trolls!!!

Again I reference: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jan/30/magnetic-monopoles-seen-in-the-lab

Kind Regards

  Chris

Did you even bother to read the article in your reference, or the original article in Nature? Of course you did not, or you wouldn't be posting the link here... SINCE IT REFUTES YOUR CLAIM and more especially ... the original article was written by people who fully endorse the conventional picture of _magnetic field lines_ .
Why don't you sent the authors an email, asking whether the conventional picture or the "peanut waist" picture is correct.  I know why not, and so does everyone else reading here.

Here's a little quote from the article you linked:

An ordinary bar magnet consists of both a north and a south pole; if the magnet is cut in two, then each of the resulting halves will also be bipolar. In fact, no matter how many times the magnet is divided, the north and south poles remain coupled – even as far down as individual atoms, which themselves act like tiny magnets. This is reflected in Maxwell's equations, which say that isolated positive and negative electric charges exist but isolated magnetic charges do not.
------------
Peter Holdsworth, a condensed-matter physicist at the Ecole Normale Supérieure in Lyon, praises the work as "an exquisite application of nanotechnology, cold atoms, high-powered computing and clever theory". He points out that the US–Finnish team has not proved the existence of magnetic monopoles, but he thinks the researchers have provided experimental confirmation of Dirac's mathematics. "It is an important result and could lead to many other analogous results," he says. "Will it help particle physicists to find real monopoles? Probably not, but it should encourage them to keep looking."

So, we can see very clearly that you have MISREPRESENTED what is contained in the PhysicsWorld article and the actual paper in Nature to which it refers.

[EMJunkie]

If you knew what you were talking about you would have stated the answer in your post #646 but you clearly didn't.  It was a Litmus test question, you sensed it was a Litmus test question, and you failed to answer it.  Bluff away all you want, the truth is you don't know your stuff when it comes to magnetics and you just bluff your way through because most of the time your YouTube audience knows even less than you and you can get away with it.  However, you can't fool all of the people all of the time.

Again MileHigh - Ramblings of a Crazy Person.

The truth is, you know Nada, Zip, Zilch about Science! You BS People here all day long. The very first reply to this topic you received was a negative one! No one trusts your Piffle and Bull Dust MileHigh.

Your Imaginary Ride Experiment is all you have got and its again your very own assumption! That's the only thing you're good at here, Assuming!

Piffle is your territory! Along with Imaginary Experiments!